OPTIMIZING eDNA METABARCODING IN INDONESIAN FRESHWATERS: A SCOPING REVIEW OF BEST PRACTICES
Downloads
ARTICLE HIGLIGHTS
- Environmental DNA studies in Indonesian freshwaters remain uneven.
- Multi-step filtering improves species detection and reduces false findings in tropical condition.
- Taxa-specific primers detect native species better than broad-range primers.
- Local databases and manual plausibility checks reduce wrong species matches.
ABSTRACT
Indonesian freshwater ecosystems harbor immense biodiversity yet remain understudied due to logistical constraints of conventional methods. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding offers a noninvasive, high-resolution alternative for biodiversity monitoring, but its uptake in Indonesia is still nascent and methodologically heterogeneous. We reviewed 106 peer-reviewed studies (of which 28 studies were eligible) published between 2015 and 2025 across Google Scholar, PubMed, DOAJ, and GARUDA, charting sampling designs, molecular workflows, and bioinformatics pipelines. Studies were heavily skewed toward Java and West Sumatra (86%) and overwhelmingly employed filtration-based sampling. Broad-range COI and 12S markers dominated (39% and 36% of studies, respectively), whereas fish-specific MiFish-U primers, demonstrating superior sensitivity and specificity, were only used in 14% of cases. Correspondingly, non-specific primer in shotgun metagenomics proven imprudent. Studies using 0.22 µm filters collected a lot of species as much as non-target amplification, while 0.45 µm filters performed inconsistently. Bioinformatics approaches (QIIME2, DADA2, mBRAVE) differed widely but showed no clear impact on detection outcomes. Key limitations included geographic and taxonomic biases, poor reference library coverage, and a lack of expert-driven plausibility checks. We recommend a standardized workflow combining coarse pre-filtration, taxa-specific primers (e.g., MiFish for fish), and manual validation against expanded local databases to strengthen eDNA-based biodiversity assessments in Indonesia.
Agustin P, Maryanto AE, Andayani N. 2022. Comparison of the 12S rRNA and COI regions of mitochondrial DNA for eDNA detection of alligator gar (Atractosteus spatula): In Yogyakarta, Indonesia. 7th International Conference on Biological Science (ICBS 2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/absr.k.220406.062
Ambeng A, Iqram M, Litaay M, Hasyim Z, Moka WJC, Tinungki GM. 2024. Combining eDNA metabarcoding and conventional method in rapid screening of fish diversity in Maros-Pangkep Global Geopark, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 25(2): 819–828 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d250242
Amin MHF, Kim HW, Then AYH, Oktavitri NI, Kim AR, Lee SR, …, Iswara ASW. 2024. A simple and cost-effective extraction for piscine environmental DNA metabarcoding using guanidine hydrochloride method. MethodsX 13:103020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2024.103020
Aprilia M, Effendi H, Hariyadi S, Permatasari PA. 2023. Aquatic eDNA metabarcoding reveals biodiversityand plankton composition in river ecosystems. Pol J Environ Stud 32(4):3491–3500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/163625
Deiner K, Bik HM, Mächler E, Seymour M, Lacoursière-Roussel A, Altermatt F, …, Bernatche L. 2017. Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities. Mol Ecol 26:5872–5895. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14350
Dewi FRP, Kim HW, Kim AR, Lee SR, Then AYH, Zamroni M, …, Amin MHF. 2024. Exploring fish communities in the mud volcano polluted river using environmental DNA metabarcoding. Environ Adv16:100534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envadv.2024.100534
Effendi H, Aprilia M, Hariyadi S, Permatasari PA. 2023. Performance of environmental DNA metabarcoding to identify and quantify benthic organisms in river ecosystems. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 1266(1):012079. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1266/1/012079
Effendi H, Aprilia M, Permatasari PA. 2024a. Comparing eDNA metabarcoding primers (12S and 18S) for assessing riparian biodiversity. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 1359(1):012080. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1359/1/012080
Effendi, H, Aprilia M, Permatasari PA, Amalo LF. 2022. Aquatic eDNA for monitoring fish biodiversity in Ciliwung River, Indonesia. AACL Bioflux 15(6):3311–3318.
Effendi H, Aprilia M, Permatasari PA, Amalo LF, Hariyadi S, Wardiatno Y. 2024b. Environmental DNA biomonitoring in urban river ecosystem: A Ciliwung River case study. Pol J Environ Stud 33(6):6127–6134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/184633
Eichmiller JJ, Miller LM, Sorensen PW. 2016. Optimizing techniques to capture and extract environmental DNA for detection and quantification of fish. Mol Ecol Resour 16(1):56–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12421
Helmizuryani H, Nizar M, Dwirastina M, Muslimin B, Heriyati E, Hidayat S, …, Fahmi IA. 2025. Exploring freshwater fish biodiversity using eDNA metabarcoding and traditional sampling to assess floodplain waters. J Water Land Dev 65 (IV–VI): 100–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24425/jwld.2025.154254
Kurniawan K, Wibowo A, Prakoso VA, Chadijah A, Astuti SS, Pratama BB, …, Stuart IG. 2025. Utilizing environmental DNA metabarcoding and local ecological knowledge for fish biodiversity assessment in rivers of Java, Indonesia. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 426(17):1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2025009
Kurniawan K, Wibowo A, Prakoso VA, Rochman F, Irawan D, Atminarso D, …, Baumgartner L. 2024. Integrating direct experimental fishing and environmental DNA metabarcoding to assess fish biodiversity in the Cibareno River, Indonesia, to support fishway design. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 34:e4250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.4250
Lohman DJ, De Bruyn M, Page T, Von Rintelen K, Hall R, Ng PKL, …, Von Rintelen T. 2011. Biogeography of the Indo-Australian Archipelago. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 42(1):205–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102710-145001
Marnis H, Syahputra K, Darmawan J, Febrianti D, Tahapari E, Larashati S, …, Syaifudin M. 2025. Utilizing eDNA methods in biodiversity studies of a river affected by anthropogenic pollution: A case study on the Batanghari River in Indonesia. Aquat Sci 87(62):1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-025-01190-2
Nabila ST, Soeprobowati TR, Cahyani NKD, Jumari J, Hariyati R, Heijnis H. 2024. Environmental DNA application to identify protozoan community in the sediment of Balekambang Lake, Dieng, Central Java. Indones J Limnol 5(1):39–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51264/inajl.v5i1.48
Nur MN, Ulayya N, Azis M, Maryanto AE, Andayani N. 2020. Methods to maximize environmental DNA (eDNA) for detection the presence of alligator gar (Atractosteus spatula). IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 538(1):012018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/538/1/012018
Paintmaps. 2025. Color Indonesia Map [Computer software]. https://paintmaps.com/map-charts/97/Indonesia-map-chart.
Permatasari PA, Aprilia M, Effendi H, Zainalarifin J. 2025. Application of eDNA technology to assess phytoplankton diversity in the Ciliwung Downstream Area, Jakarta, Indonesia. Media Konservasi 30(1):53–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29244/medkon.30.1.53
Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC, Pollock D, Munn Z, Alexander L, …, Khalil H. 2020. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis 18(10):2119–2126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-20-00167
Priyono DS, Reza A, Eprilurahman R, Yudha DS, Mufti F, Fauzy NH, …, Adhi PK. 2022. Aquatic biodiversity in a pond on the airport landside areas through environmental DNA metabarcoding: Implementation for aviation security management. Biodiversitas 23(7):3638–3645. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d230741
Rahmi KA, Adharini RI, Sari DWK, Satriyo TB. 2023. Detection of the presence and distribution of invasive fish in the Progo River, Yogyakarta, Indonesia using the environmental DNA method. Biodiversitas 24(1):276–281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d240133
Rockwell G, Sinclair S. 2025. Voyant Tools [Computer software]. https://voyanttools.org/?query=edna&query= indonesia&stopList=auto&context=3&corpus= dc5d0fda8a878bde76cc4a3d3f408995 &view=CollocatesGraph
Roesma DI, Djong HT, Janra MN, Aidil DR. 2021a. Freshwater vertebrates monitoring in Maninjau Lake, West Sumatra, Indonesia using environmental DNA. Biodiversitas 22(5):2794–2802. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d220543
Roesma DI, Tjong DH, Janra MN, Aidil DR. 2021b. Fish diversity monitoring in Maninjau Lake, West Sumatra using the eDNA with the next generation sequencing (NGS) technique. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 819(1):012045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/819/1/012045
Roesma DI, Tjong DH, Janra, MN, Rabbani D, Prawira FDL, Salis VM. 2025. DNA barcoding and eDNA metabarcoding for identification species: A case study (West Sumatra). J Trop Life Sci 15(1):161–176.
Roesma DI, Tjong DH, Syaifullah, Nofrita N, Janra MN, Prawira FDL, …, Aidil, DR. 2023a. Fish biodiversity monitoring in Singkarak Lake, West Sumatra: Comparison of fish detections using environmental DNA and conventional methods. In: Fadilah M, Rahmawati D, Kardiman R, Satria R (Editors), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Biology, Science and Education (IcoBioSE 2021) 32:461–474. Dordrecht (NL): Atlantis Press International BV. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-166-1_56
Roesma DI, Tjong DH, Syaifullah S, Nofrita N, Janra MN, Prawira FDL, …, Aidil DR. 2023b. The importance of DNA barcode reference libraries and selection primer pair in monitoring fish diversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding. Biodiversitas 24(4):2251–2260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d240438
Stat M, Huggett MJ, Bernasconi R, DiBattista JD, Berry TE, Newman SJ, …, Bunce M. 2017. Ecosystem biomonitoring with eDNA: Metabarcoding across the tree of life in a tropical marine environment. Sci Rep 7:12240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12501-5
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, …, Straus SE. 2018. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. annals of internal medicine 169(7):467–473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
Turner CR, Barnes MA, Xu CCY, Jones SE, Jerde CL, Lodge DM. 2014. Particle size distribution and optimal capture of aqueous macrobial EDNA. Methods Ecol Evol 5(7):676–684. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12206
Ulayya N, Andayani N, Maryanto AE. 2020. Development of environmental DNA approaches to detect alligator gar (Atractosteus spatula) from water samples. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 481(1):012013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/481/1/012013
Wibowo A, Kurniawan K, Atminarso D, Prihadi TH, Baumgartner LJ, Rourke ML, …, Vasemagi A. 2022. Assessing freshwater fish biodiversity of Kumbe River, Papua (Indonesia) through environmental DNA metabarcoding. Pacific Conserv Biol 29(4):340–350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/PC21078
Yudha DS, Izzati R, Ardianto, AS, Nainggolan AP, Priyono DS. 2023. Monitoring the diversity of amphibian and reptiles in the upstream part of Code River using e-DNA method. Berkala Ilmiah Biologi 14(1):8–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/bib.v14i1.4847
Yudha DS, Priyono DS, Izzati R, Ardianto AS, Puradi A, Nainggolan N. 2021. Comparising DNA extraction from environmental DNA samples to reveal the diversity of freshwater metazoans. Biogenesis 9(2):206–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/bio.v9i2.24390
Yudha DS, Salsabila S, Priyono DS. 2024. Keanekaragaman Jenis Ikan di Hulu Sungai Opak menggunakan Environmental DNA (eDNA) Metabarcoding [Fish biodiversity in the upstream part of Opak River using environmental DNA (eDNA)]. Biota 9(3):238–246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24002/biota.v9i3.7864
Copyright (c) 2026 I Dewa Agung Panji Dwipayana, Ni Luh Putu Kayika Febryanti, Yan Ramona
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree with the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work 1 year after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons attribution-noncommerical-noderivates 4.0 International License that allows others to share, copy and redistribute the work in any medium or format, but only where the use is for non-commercial purposes and an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal is mentioned.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
