MONITORING FOREST AREA CHANGE USING QUICKBIRD
Downloads
A study was conducted to compare the urban forest management in three urban forests in Samarinda City. The application of GIS (Geographic Information System) is one of the alternatives to conduct a variety of processes such as: providing geographical information system, identifying the areas of urban forests in Samarinda, helping to plan the process of map digitalization and performing overlay process. The main method used for the data analysis process on the map was the overlay process data analysis technique. The research findings showed that: 1) the appointment of urban forests as the initial step of urban forest development needed more implementation from the government; 2) the urban forest determination needed more socialization to the owner of the urban forest and the public in 1992 and 2019; 3) the urban forests needed more management. There were some similarities and differences in the management of urban forests in the three study locations. The similarities among the three locations were that the three locations had already met the minimum standards of one urban forest location even though there was still one location outside of these three locations which did not meet the minimum standard. The differences were in managing the urban forests. These differences indicated that the urban forest policy was not fully implemented in Samarinda City.
Abdullahi MG, Khairul M, Kamarudin A, Umar R, Endut A. 2017. Night sky brightness assessment in Nigeria using environmetric and GIS techniques. Int J Adv Sci Eng Inf Technol 7(1):28–34.
Agustino L. 2006. Dasar-dasar kebijakan publik. Bandung (ID): Alfabeta.
Angel M, Aliaga-Samanez A, Olivero J, Williams D, Dupain J. 2019. Spatial modeling for predicting potential wildlife distributions and human impacts in the Dja Forest Reserve, Cameroon. Biol Conserv 230:104–112. DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2018.12.015
Balachandran C, Chandran MDS, Vinay S, Shrikant N, Ramachandra TV. 2017. Pollinator diversity and foraging dynamics on monsoon crops of cucurbits in a traditional landscape of South Indian west coast. BIOTROPIA 24(1):16–27. DOI:10.11598/btb.2017.24.1.480
Caddeo A, Marras S, Sallustio L, Spano D, Sirca C. 2019. Soil organic carbon in Italian forests and agroecosystems: Estimating current stock and future changes with a spatial modelling approach. Agric For Meteorol 278:107654. DOI:10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107654
Cao B, Domke GM, Russell MB, Walters BF. 2019. Spatial modeling of litter and soil carbon stocks on forest land in the conterminous United States. Sci Total Environ 654:94–106. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.359
Carrer M, Castagneri D, Popa I, Pividori M, Lingua E. 2018. Tree spatial patterns and stand attributes in temperate forests: The importance of plot size, sampling design, and null model. For Ecol Manag 407:125–134. DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2017.10.041
Daoed D, Rusman B, Istijono B, Hakam A, Syukur M. 1997. Evaluation of drought vulnerability on watersheds in West Sumatera Province using Cropwat-8 and GIS. Int J Adv Sci Eng Inf Technol 8(6):2443–2449.
De Jager NR, Van Appledorn M, Fox TJ, Rohweder JJ, Guyon LJ, Meier AR, Cosgriff RJ, Vandermyde BJ. 2019. Spatially explicit modeling of floodplain forest succession in the Upper Mississippi River floodplain, USA. Ecol Model 405:15–32. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.05.002
Deng K, Webb GF, Wu Y. 2020. Age- and spatially dependent population model applied to forest growth. Nonlinear Anal Real World Appl 56:103164. DOI:10.1016/j.nonrwa.2020.103164
Diodato N, Bellocchi G. 2020. Spatial probability modeling of forest productivity indicators in Italy. Ecol Indic 108:105721. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105721
Fernández-Guisuraga JM, Suárez-Seoane S, Calvo L. 2019. Modeling Pinus pinaster forest structure after wildfire using high-resolution remote sensing. For Ecol Manag 446:257–271. DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2019.05.028
Guo X, Bian Z, Wang S, Wang Q, Zhang Y, Zhou J, Lin L. 2020. Predicting spatial distribution of soil arthropods using random forest models. Agric Ecosyst Environ 292:106818. DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2020.106818
Hafeez K, Khan MAU. 2012. Application of GIS for installation of surge arrestors on overhead power lines. Int J Adv Sci Eng Inf Technol 2(6):6–8.
Hong NT, Thi P, Truc T, Liem ND, Loi NK. 2017. Optimal selection of hydrological monitoring networks using GIS. Int J Adv Sci Eng Inf Technol 6(3):324–328.
Ismail N. 2009. Public policy: Analisis, strategi advokasi teori dan praktek. Surabaya (ID): CV Putra Media Nusantara.
Lagacherie P, Arrouays D, Bourennane H, Gomez C, Nkuba-Kasanda L. 2020. Impact of soil spatial sampling on digital soil mapping using quantile random forest. Geoderma 375:114503. DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114503
Lister AJ, Leites LP. 2018. Modeling tree spatial patterns using hierarchical spatial point processes. Ecol Model 378:37–45. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.03.012
Liu W, Lin C, Su K. 2017. Spatial forest-thinning planning considering carbon sequestration. For Policy Econ 78:51–66. DOI:10.1016/j.forpol.2017.01.002
Nguyen LD, Nguyen CT, Le HS, Tran BQ. 2019. Mangrove mapping and biomass change detection using satellite images in Vietnam. Forest and Society 3(2):248–261.
Nuddin A, Arsyad M, Putera MI, Nuringsih N. 2019. Institutional support for agroforestry technology models. Forest and Society 3(1):49–63.
Podlaski R. 2019. Fine-scale spatial distributions of trees in managed and unmanaged forests. For Ecol Manag 439:1–8. DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2019.02.031
Reza H, Gayen A, Lasaponara R, Tiefenbacher JP. 2020. Machine learning approaches for forest fire spatial modelling. Environ Res 184:109321. DOI:10.1016/j.envres.2020.109321
Rose R. 1990. Inheritance before choice in public policy. J Theor Polit 2(3):263–291.
Sameen MI, Sarkar R, Pradhan B, Drukpa D. 2019. Landslide spatial modelling using regularised greedy forests. Comput Geosci 134:104336. DOI:10.1016/j.cageo.2019.104336
Shang C, Coops NC, Wulder MA, White JC, Hermosilla T. 2020. Spatial extension of forest inventories using remote sensing. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 84:101956.
Sulistyo B, Gunawan T, Hartono, Danoedoro P, Martanto R. 2017. Model of degraded land levels at Merawu Watershed. BIOTROPIA 24(3):220–229.
Viccaro M, Cozzi M, Fanelli L, Romano S. 2019. Economic impacts of climate change on forests using spatial modelling. Ecol Indic 106:105523.
Zhao C, Wang Q, Ban J, Liu Z, Zhang Y, Ma R, Li T. 2020. Estimating daily PM2.5 using random forest models. Environ Int 134:105297.
Copyright (c) 2022 Sri Endayani, Andrew Stefano, Fathiah Fathiah, Purbawati Purbawati, Ida Rosanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree with the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work 1 year after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons attribution-noncommerical-noderivates 4.0 International License that allows others to share, copy and redistribute the work in any medium or format, but only where the use is for non-commercial purposes and an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal is mentioned.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
