WILD IN THE CITY: UNAUTHORIZED POSSESSION OF WILD FAUNA IN RESIDENCES OF VALENCIA CITY, BUKIDNON, PHILIPPINES
Downloads
ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS
- Covert surveys revealed undocumented wildlife possession within Valencia City residences.
- Fifteen species were identified, including three threatened endemic species.
- Philippine long-tailed macaque was documented in all study sites.
- Human-wildlife interactions may have fueled locals to keep wild animals.
- Findings advocate amnesty programs to bolster biodiversity conservation in the urban areas.
ABSTRACT
The illegal wildlife trade is a globally recognized industry, and the unauthorized possession of wildlife by locals is a significantly overlooked facet of this field. While significant seizures of poached animals were recorded in the country, many remain undocumented and undetected, specifically in small-scale collections or privately owned wildlife. This study assessed the ownership of wild fauna in five locations in Valencia City, Bukidnon, Philippines. A covert research approach was used to elicit information from the owners, which was done randomly within the months of March to April 2025. A total of 26 owners were interviewed, the majority are male (19; 73%), aged 40 – 45 years old (12; 46%), low-income farmers (17; 65%), and with primary education (16; 62%). The results revealed 63 individuals from 15 species: 8 species of birds, 4 species of mammals, and 3 species of reptiles. Of which, 12 (80%) species are classified as least concern, two (13%) are endangered, and one is undetermined. Birds are the most frequently recorded group (24 individuals), mainly intended for consumption, while Macaca fascicularis philippensis exist across all five barangays because of their behavioral flexibility and presumed human compatibility. Owners’ responses indicate that they keep such animals mainly for recreation or hobby (15; 25%), which reflects the affinity of locals to keep wild animals in the city may have been associated with human-wildlife interactions and humans’ familiarity with native and endemic animals. Therefore, the study recommends strengthening the enforcement of existing national laws and international provisions through community-based conservation models, local wildlife amnesty programs, and partnerships with government and non-government organizations.
Alves MM, Lopes F, Nóbrega Alves RR. 2016. Wild vertebrates kept as pets in the semiarid region of Brazil. Trop Conserv Sci 9(1):354–368. DOI: 10.1177/194008291600900119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/194008291600900119
Archer LJ, Turvey ST, Apale C M, Corona DB, Amada RL, Papworth SK. 2021. Digging deeper: Understanding the illegal trade and local use of pangolins in Palawan Province, Philippines. Front Conserv Sci 2:746366. DOI: 10.3389/fcosc.2021.746366 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2021.746366
Asian Development Bank. 2019. Addressing illegal wildlife trade in the Philippines. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/490006/addressin-illegal-wildlife-trade-philippines.pdf
Badihi G, Nielsen DRK, Garber PA, Gill M, Jones-Engel L, Maldonado AM, …, Hansen MF. 2024. Perspectives on conservation impacts of the global primate trade. Int J Primatol 45(4):972–999. DOI: 10.1007/s10764-024-00431-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-024-00431-9
Brandis KJ, Meagher P, Schoppe S, Zawada K, Widmann I, Widmann P, …, Francis R. 2023. Determining the provenance of traded wildlife in the Philippines. Animals 13(13):2165. DOI: 10.3390/ani13132165 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13132165
Calvey D. 2018. Covert ethnography in criminal justice and criminology: The controversial tradition of doing undercover fieldwork. OREs. DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.013.296 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.013.296
Canlas CP, Sy EY, Chng S. 2017. A rapid survey of online trade in live birds and reptiles in the Philippines. TRAFFIC Bulletin 29(2):58–62.
Clements GR, Lynam AJ, Gaveau D, Yap WL, Lhota S, Goosem M, …, Laurance WF. 2014. Where and how are roads endangering mammals in Southeast Asia's Forests? PLoS One 9(12):e115376. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115376 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115376
Cronin KA, Leahy M, Ross SR, Schook MW, Ferrie GM, Alba AC. 2022. Younger generations are more interested than older generations in having non-domesticated animals as pets. PLoS One 17(1):e0262208. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262208 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262208
Cruz RAL, Lagunzad CGB. 2021. The big picture: Consolidating national government and CITES records of animal trade in the Philippines from 1975 to 2019. Philipp Sci Lett 14:79–100.
Esmail N, Wintle BC, Sas-Rolfes M, Athanas A, Beale CM, Bending Z, ... Milner-Gulland EJ. 2020. Emerging illegal wildlife trade issues: A global horizon scan. Conserv Lett 13(4):e12715. DOI: 10.1111/conl.12715 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12715
Falzon G, Lawson C, Cheung W, Vernes K, Ballard GA, S Fleming PJ, …, Meek PD. 2019. ClassifyMe: A field-scouting software for the identification of wildlife in camera trap images. Animals 10(1):58. DOI: 10.3390/ani10010058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10010058
Garber PA, Estrada A, Shanee S, Svensson MS, Arregoitia LV, Nijman V, …, Hansen MF. 2024. Global wildlife trade and trafficking contribute to the world’s nonhuman primate conservation crisis. Front Conserv Sci 5:1400613. DOI: 10.3389/fcosc.2024.1400613 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2024.1400613
Homan R. 1980. The ethics of covert methods. Br J Sociol 31(1):46–59. DOI: 10.2307/590062 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/590062
Hopman MJ. 2022. Covert qualitative research as a method to study human rights under authoritarian regimes. J Hum Rights Pract 13(3):548–564. DOI: 10.1093/jhuman/huab056 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huab056
Hopper LM, Flynn EG, Wood LAN, Whiten A. 2010. Observational learning of tool use in children: Investigating cultural spread through diffusion chains and learning mechanisms through ghost displays. J Exp Child Psychol 106(1):82–97. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.12.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2009.12.001
Hutchinson R, Tañedo M, Constantino A, Constantino T. 2019. A naturalist’s guide to the birds of the Philippines. Oxford (UK): John Beaufoy Publishing.
Iannone BV, Carnevale S, Main MB, Hill JE, McConnell JB. 2020. Invasive species terminology: Standardizing for stakeholder education. J Ext 58(3):1–20. DOI: 10.34068/joe.58.03.27 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34068/joe.58.03.27
Imanda H, Wright J. 2019. Location privacy in conservation. ArXiv:1–9. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1907.07054
Ingle NR, Heaney LR. 1992. A key to the bats of the Philippine Islands. Illinois (US): Field Museum of Natural History.
Kittelberger KD, Neate-Clegg MHC, Blount JD, Posa MRC, McLaughlin J, Şekercioğlu ÇH. 2021. Biological correlates of extinction risk in resident Philippine avifauna. Front Ecol Evol 9:664764. DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2021.664764 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.664764
Kraus D, Enns A, Hebb A, Murphy SR, Drake DA, Bennett B. 2022. Prioritizing nationally endemic species for conservation. Conserv Sc Pract 5(1):e12845. DOI: 10.1111/csp2.12845 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12845
Leviton AE, Brown RM, Siler CD. 2011. The dangerously venomous snakes of the Philippine Archipelago with identification keys and species accounts. Calif Acad Sci 1(1):473–530.
Leviton AE, Siler CD, Weinell JL, Brown RM. 2018. Synopsis of the snakes of the Philippines: A synthesis of data from biodiversity repositories, field studies, and the literature. Proc Calif Acad Sci 64(14):399–568.
Maisels F, Strindberg S, Blake S, Wittemyer G, Hart J, Williamson EA, …, Warren Y. 2013. Devastating decline of forest elephants in Central Africa. PLoS One 8(3):e59469. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059469 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059469
Marshall BM, Strine C, Hughes AC. 2020. Thousands of reptile species threatened by under-regulated global trade. Nat Commun 11(1):1–12. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-18523-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18523-4
Miele V, Dussert G, Spataro B, Chamaillé-Jammes S, Allainé D, Bonenfant C. 2021. Revisiting animal photo-identification using deep metric learning and network analysis. Methods Ecol Evol 12(5):863–873. DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.13577 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13577
Mohamad Muslim HF, Tetsuro H, Shinya N, Yahya NA. 2018. Nature experience promotes preference for and willingness to coexist with wild animals among urban and suburban residents in Malaysia. Ecol Process 7(1):1–12. DOI: 10.1186/s13717-018-0127-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-018-0127-7
Morcatty TQ, Su S, Siriwat P, Andersson AA, Atoussi S, Feddema K, …, Roberts DL. 2024. Navigating ethical challenges in online wildlife trade research. Conserv Biol 38(5):e14341. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.14341 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14341
Mozer A, Prost S. 2023. An introduction to illegal wildlife trade and its effects on biodiversity and society. Forensic Sci Int 3:100064. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsiae.2023.100064 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsiae.2023.100064
Nellemann C, Henriksen R, Raxter P, Ash N, Mrema E. 2014. The environmental crime crisis: Threats to sustainable development from illegal exploitation and trade in wildlife and forest resources. United Nations.
Nijman V. 2009. An overview of international wildlife trade from Southeast Asia. Biodivers Conserv 19(4):1101–1114. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-009-9758-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9758-4
Norouzzadeh MS, Nguyen A, Kosmala M, Swanson A, Palmer MS, Packer C, Clune J. 2018. Automatically identifying, counting, and describing wild animals in camera-trap images with deep learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115(25):E5716. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1719367115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719367115
Raymundo JJG, Chng S, Sy EY. 2024. The trade of live tarantulas and scorpions in a social media platform in the Philippines. J Nat Stud 23(2):1–21. DOI: 10.56899/152.6A.07
Raymundo JJG, Sy EY, Chng S. 2023. Farmers of the forest in cages: The online trade of hornbills in the Philippines. Cambridge (UK): TRAFFIC.
Romero-Vidal P, Blanco G, Barbosa JM, Carrete M, Hiraldo F, Pacifico EC, …, Tella JL. 2024. The widespread keeping of wild pets in the Neotropics: An overlooked risk for human, livestock and wildlife health. People Nat 6(3):1–13. DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10625 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10625
Rosales Chavez J, Morales Guerrero J, Clark JA. 2023. Evaluating how varied human-wildlife interactions affect physical, mental, social, and spiritual health. SSM Qual Res Health 4:100302. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100302 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100302
Salas-Picazo RI, Ramírez-Bravo OE, Meza-Padilla I, Camargo-Rivera EE. 2023. The role of social media groups on illegal wildlife trade in four Mexican states: A year-long assessment. Glob Ecol Conserv 45:e02539. DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02539 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02539
Sas-Rolfes M, Challender DW, Hinsley A, Veríssimo D, Milner-Gulland EJ. 2019. Illegal wildlife trade: Scale, processes, and governance. Annu Rev Environ Resour 44(1):201–228. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033253 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033253
Scheffers BR, Corlett RT, Diesmos A, Laurance WF. 2012. Local demand drives a bushmeat industry in a Philippine Forest preserve. Trop Conserv Sci. DOI: 10.1177/194008291200500203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/194008291200500203
Sengottuvel RR, Mendis A, Shukla NSS, Chaudhuri A, Mendiratta U. 2023. From pets to plates: network analysis of trafficking in tortoises and freshwater turtles representing different types of demand. Oryx 58(1):1–12. DOI: 10.1017/S0030605323000376 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605323000376
Shan S, Ju X, Wei Y, Wen X. 2022. Concerned or apathetic? Using social media platform (Twitter) to gauge the public awareness about wildlife conservation: A case study of the illegal rhino trade. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(11):6869. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19116869 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116869
Shepherd CR, Compton J, Warne S. 2007. Transport infrastructure and wildlife trade conduits in the GMS: Regulating illegal and unsustainable wildlife trade. Cambridge (UK): TRAFFIC.
Shepherd CR, Shepherd LA. 2019. A naturalist’s guide to the primates of Southeast Asia. Oxford (UK): John Beaufoy Publishing.
Skidmore A. 2021. Uncovering the nuances of criminal motivations and modus operandi in the Russian Far East: A wildlife crime case study. Methodol Innov 14. DOI: 10.1177/20597991211022015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991211022015
Sy EY. 2021. Wildlife from forests to cages: An analysis of wildlife seizures in the Philippines. Cambridge (UK): TRAFFIC.
Sy EY, Krishnasamy K. 2023. Endangered by trade: The ongoing illegal pangolin trade in the Philippines. Cambridge (UK): TRAFFIC.
Sy EY, Lorenzo AN. 2023. Online trade of freshwater turtle and tortoises in the Philipiines. Philipp J Sci 152(6A):2111–2128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56899/152.6A.07
Takaya K, Taguchi Y, Ise T. 2023. Individual identification of endangered amphibians using deep learning and smartphone images: Case study of the Japanese giant salamander (Andrias japonicus). Sci Rep 13:16212. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-40814-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40814-1
Thompson RM, Hall J, Morrison C, Palmer NR, Roberts DL. 2021. Ethics and governance for internet-based conservation science research. Conserv Biol 35(6):1747–1754. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13778 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13778
Toomes A, García-Díaz P, Stringham OC, Ross JV, Mitchell L, Cassey P. 2022. Drivers of the Australian native pet trade: The role of species traits, socioeconomic attributes and regulatory systems. J Appl Ecol 59(5):1268–1278. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.14138 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14138
Weinell JL, Hooper E, Leviton AE, Brown RM. 2019. Illustrated key to the snakes of the Philippines. Proc Calif Acad Sci 66(1):1–49.
Whitfort A. 2021. COVID-19 and wildlife farming in China: legislating to protect wild animal health and welfare in the wake of a global pandemic. J Environ Law 33(1):57–84. DOI: 10.1093/jel/eqaa030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqaa030
World Wildlife Fund. 2006. Illegal and unsustainable wildlife trade. [Internet]. Available from: https://wwfint.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/wildlife_trade_factsheet2006.pdf
Copyright (c) 2026 Khean Harvey Acuevas, Adrian Aturo, Dave Buenavista
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree with the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work 1 year after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons attribution-noncommerical-noderivates 4.0 International License that allows others to share, copy and redistribute the work in any medium or format, but only where the use is for non-commercial purposes and an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal is mentioned.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
