Effectiveness of DNA Barcoding Primers in Red Algae (Rhodophyta) Identification

Authors

  • Aidil Zaid Khan Agrotechnology Study Program, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang
  • Ardian Putra Fernando Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia
  • Edo Agam Pamungkas Production Technology of Crop Plantation Study Program, Politeknik Kelapa Sawit Citra Widya Edukasi, Bekasi 17520, Indonesia
  • Ayu Andhira Forestry Engineering Study Program, Faculty of Forestry, Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar 90245, Indonesia
  • Rifa Nur Ishlah Southeast Asian Regional Centre for Tropical Biology (SEAMEO BIOTROP), Bogor 16134, Indonesia
  • Denia Dwi Citra Resmi Southeast Asian Regional Centre for Tropical Biology (SEAMEO BIOTROP), Bogor 16134, Indonesia
  • Farida Damayanti Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia
  • Dewi Rahmawati Southeast Asian Regional Centre for Tropical Biology (SEAMEO BIOTROP), Bogor 16134, Indonesia

Keywords:

DNA barcoding, genetic identification, primer, seaweed

Abstract

Red algae (Rhodophyta) are vital primary producers in marine ecosystems and are economically significant due to their wide use in food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic industries. The significant utilization of red algae indicates that these organisms require conservation and protection from extinction, therefore, accurate identification is a must. Traditional morphological approaches face challenges due to their simplicity and plasticity; however, molecular techniques, such as DNA barcoding can overcome these limitations. This study evaluated the effectiveness of using ITS1, Cox2-3, rbcL 1, and rbcL 2 primers for barcoding seven red algae species, focusing on amplification success and sequencing quality. All of the above-mentioned primers have demonstrated a noteworthy amplification rate of success, with 100% efficacy observed for ITS1 and rbcL 2. However, only Cox2-3, rbcL 1, and rbcL 2 primers exhibited a high-quality read based on the sequencing quality score, indicating their reliability in capturing the target sequence for identification. The results strongly suggested that rbcL 2 is the optimal choice for identifying Rhodophyta due to its high amplification rate and high-quality sequencing results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Achmad, M. J., Akbar, N., Ismail, F., Samman, A., Subhan, B., Paembonan, R. E., & Arafat, D. (2024). DNA barcoding of red algae (Rhodophyta) in Ternate Island Sea, North Maluku, Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Perikanan dan Kelautan, 16(1). http://doi.org/10.20473/jipk. v16i1.44436

Araújo, P. G., Nardelli, A. E., Fujii, M. T., & Chow, F. (2020). Antioxidant properties of different strains of Kappaphycus alvarezii (Rhodophyta) farmed on the Brazilian coast. Phycologia, 59(3), 272–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/00318884.2020.1736878

Bafeel, S. O., Arif, I. A., Bakir, M. A., Khan, H. A., Al Farhan, A. H., Al Homaidan, A. A., ... & Thomas, J. (2011). Comparative evaluation of PCR success with universal primers of maturase K (matK) and ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) for barcoding of some arid plants. Plant Omics, 4(4), 195-198.

Bustin, S. A., Mueller, R., & Nolan, T. (2020). Parameters for successful PCR primer design. Quantitative Real-Time PCR: Methods and Protocols, 5-22.

Dev, S. A., Sijimol, K., Prathibha, P. S., Sreekumar, V. B., & Muralidharan, E. M. (2020). DNA barcoding as a valuable molecular tool for the certification of planting materials in bamboo. 3 Biotech, 10, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-019-2018-8

Doyle, J. J., & Doyle J. L. (1990). Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus, 12, 13-15.

Guo, L., Sui, Z., Zhang, S., Ren, Y., & Liu, Y. (2015). Comparison of potential diatom ‘barcode’genes (the 18S rRNA gene and ITS, COI, rbcL) and their effectiveness in discriminating and determining species taxonomy in the Bacillariophyta. International Journal of

Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 65(4), 1369-1380.

Hebert, P. D., Cywinska, A., Ball, S. L. & deWaard, J. R. (2003). Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Biol Sci, 270, 313–321.

Hogg, C. J., Ottewell, K., Latch, P., Rossetto, M., Biggs, J., Gilbert, A., ... & Belov, K. (2022). Threatened species initiative: Empowering conservation action using genomic resources. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(4), e2115643118. https://10.1073/pnas.2115643118

Kowalska, Z., Pniewski, F., & Latała, A. (2019). DNA barcoding–A new device in phycologist’s toolbox. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, 19(3), 417-427.

Kress, W. J. & Erickson, D. L. (2008). DNA barcodes: genes, genomics, and bioinformatics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 105, 2761– 2762.

Lee, J. H., Jeon, H. J., Seo, S., Lee, C., Kim, B., Kwak, D. M., ... & Han, J. E. (2024). The use of the internal transcribed spacer region for phylogenetic analysis of the microsporidian parasite Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei infecting whiteleg shrimp (Penaeusvannamei) and for the development of a nested PCR as its diagnostic tool. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 34(5), 1146. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2401.01010

Letsiou, S., Madesis, P., Vasdekis, E., Montemurro, C., Grigoriou, M. E., Skavdis, G., ... & Tzakos, A. G. (2024). DNA Barcoding as a Plant Identification Method. Applied Sciences, 14(4), 1415. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14041415

Mshiywa, F. M., Edwards, S., & Bradley, G. (2024). Rhodophyta DNA barcoding: Ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase gene and novel universal primers. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(1),58. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25010058

Nogueira, M.C.F., Henriques, M.B.(2020). Large-scale versus family-sized system production: economic feasibility of cultivating Kappaphycus alvarezii along the southeastern coast of Brazil. J Appl Phycol 32, 1893-1905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-020-02107-2.

Osathanunkul, M., Osathanunkul, R., & Madesis, P. (2018). Species identification approach for both raw materials and end products of herbal supplements from Tinospora species. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 18, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-018-2174-0

Phillips, J. D., Gillis, D. J., & Hanner, R. H. (2019). Incomplete estimates of genetic diversity within species: Implications for DNA barcoding. Ecology and Evolution, 9(5), 2996-3010.

Rajasulochana, P., & Preethy, V. (2015). Biotechnological applications of marine red algae. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 7(12), 477-481.

Roux, K. H. (2009). Optimization and troubleshooting in PCR. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols, 2009(4), pdb-ip66.

Ruggiero, M. A., Gordon, D. P., Orrell, T. M., Bailly, N., Bourgoin, T., Brusca, R. C., Cavalier-Smith, T., Guiry, M. D., & Kirk, P. M. (2015). PloS one, 10(4), e0119248. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119248

Samman, A., & Achmad, M. J. (2023). Diversitas dan distribusi alga merah (Rhodophyta) di Perairan Pulau Ternate. Jurnal Kelautan Tropis, 26(1), 148-154. https://doi.org/10.14710/jekk.v%vi%i.13342

Satriani, G. I., Soelistyowati, D. T., Alimuddin, A., Arfah, H., & Effendi, I. (2023). Molecular assessment of Kappaphycus alvarezii cultivated in Tarakan based on Cox2-3 spacer. Squalen Bulletin of Marine and Fisheries Postharvest and Biotechnology, 18(1), 52-64. https://doi.org/%2010.15578/squalen.736

Satriani, G. I., Soelistyowati, D. T., Arfah, H., & Effendi, I. (2024). Identification of Kappaphycus alvarezii Seaweed based on phylogenetic and carrageenan content. Jurnal Akuakultur Indonesia, 23(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.19027/jai.23.1.1-11

Shi, H., & Xu, X. (2016). Learning the Sequences Quality Control of Bioinformatics Analysis Method. In 2016 International Conference on Education, E-learning and Management Technology (pp. 464-468). Atlantis Press.

Subramaniam, D., Hanna, L. E., Maheshkumar, K., Ponmurugan, K., Al-Dhabi, N. A., & Murugan, P. (2020). Immune stimulatory and anti-HIV-1 potential of extracts derived from marine brown algae Padina tetrastromatica. Journal of Complementary and Integrative Medicine, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/jcim-2019-0071

Tanaka, Y., Ashaari, A., Mohamad, F. S., & Lamit, N. (2020). Bioremediation potential of tropical seaweeds in aquaculture: low-salinity tolerance, phosphorus content, and production of UV-absorbing compounds. Aquaculture, 518, 734853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. aquaculture.2019.734853

Theissinger, K., Fernandes, C., Formenti, G., Bista, I., Berg, P. R., Bleidorn, C., ... & Zammit, G. (2023). How genomics can help biodiversity conservation. Trends in Genetics, 39(7), 545-559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2023.01.005

Turk Dermastia, T., Vascotto, I., Francé, J., Stanković, D., & Mozetič, P. (2023). Evaluation of the rbcL marker for metabarcoding of marine diatoms and inference of population structure of selected genera. Frontiers in Microbiology, 14, 1071379. Wingett, S. W., &

Andrews, S. (2018). FastQ Screen: A tool for multi-genome mapping and quality control. F1000Research, 7. Wongsawad, P., & Peerapornpisal, Y. (2014). Molecular identification and phylogenetic relationship of green algae, Spirogyra ellipsospora (Chlorophyta) using ISSR and rbcL markers. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 21(5), 505-510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2014.01.003

Zuccarello, G. C., Burger, G., West, J. A., & King, R. J. (1999). A mitochondrial marker for red algal intraspecific relationships. Molecular Ecology, 8(9), 1443-1447.

Zuccarello, G.C., Buchanan, J., & West, J. A. (2006). Increased sampling for inferring phylogeographic patterns in Bostrychia radicans/B.moritziana (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta) in the eastern USA. Journal of Phycology, 42, 1349–1352. http://dx.doi.

org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2006.00292.x

Zuccarello, G. C., & Paul, N. A. (2019). A beginner’s guide to molecular identification of seaweed. Squalen Bull. of Mar. and Fish. Postharvest and Biotech, 14(1), 43-53. https://doi.org/10.15578/squalen.v14i1.384

Downloads

Published

2025-03-18

How to Cite

Khan, A. Z., Fernando, A. P., Pamungkas, E. A., Andhira, A., Ishlah, R. N., Resmi, D. D. C., … Rahmawati, D. (2025). Effectiveness of DNA Barcoding Primers in Red Algae (Rhodophyta) Identification. BIODIVERS - BIOTROP Science Magazine, 4(1), 1–8. Retrieved from https://journal.biotrop.org/index.php/biodivers/article/view/2491

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): BIODIVERS Volume 4 No. 1 (2025)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Aidil Zaid Khan, Ardian Putra Fernando, Edo Agam Pamungkas, Ayu Andhira, Rifa Nur Ishlah, Denia Dwi Citra Resmi, Farida Damayanti, Dewi Rahmawati

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work 1 year after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons attribution-noncommerical-noderivates 4.0 International License that allows others to share, copy and redistribute the work in any medium or format, but only where the use is for non-commercial purposes and an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal is mentioned.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Most read articles by the same author(s)