STORED COCOA BEANS QUALITY AFFECTED BY FERMENTATION AND EPHESTIA CAUTELLA WALKER (LEPIDOPTERA: PHYCITIDAE) INFESTATION
AbstractThe effects of fermentation on Ephestia cautella population and cocoa beans quality in terms of
moisture content, fungal population, the percentage of insect-damaged and mouldy beans, lipid and free
fatty acid contents during storage were investigated together with the effects of Â£. cautella infestation on
the quality of stored cocoa beans and weight loss.
Fermented and unfermented cocoa beans with initial moisture contents of 7 or 9% were placed in
ventilated plastic jars (Ikg/jar) and stored for 6 months under room conditions. Seven larvae of Â£.
cautella instar IV (2 males and 5 females) were introduced in each jar at the beginning of storage.
Untreated jars contained only cocoa beans.
Population of Â£. cautella on fermented cocoa beans with either initial moisture content of 7 or 9%
was lower than that on unfermented beans during storage. The population either on fermented or
unfermented cocoa beans with initial moisture content of 7% was lower than that of 9%, and the
population of all treatments increased during storage. Moisture content of all treatments either on cocoa
beans with initial moisture contents of 7 or 9% had the same pattern. The percentage of insect-damaged
beans on fermented cocoa beans was lower than that on unfermented cocoa beans after 5 to 6 months of
storage. The damaged beans on fermented cocoa after 6 months of storage was not different than on
unfermented beans after 4 months of storage. The weight loss either on fermented or unfermented cocoa
beans with initial moisture content of 9% was higher than that with initial moisture content of 7%. The
weight loss on fermented cocoa beans either with moisture content of 7 or 9% was lower than that on
unfermented beans during storage. The weight loss either on fermented or unfermented cocoa beans
increased during storage. The percentage of mouldy beans on cocoa infested with Â£. cautella tended to
increase during storage, while on beans not infested with the insect it fluctuated during storage. The
highest percentage of mouldy beans was on unfermented and infested cocoa beans. Twenty-one fungal
species were isolated from all treatments of cocoa beans during storage. The total fungal population on
fermented and unfermented beans had the same pattern. The population on fermented cocoa beans was
lower than that on unfermented beans. Total l ipid content on fermented cocoa beans either infested or
not with Â£. cautella having initial moisture content of 7 or 9%, was lower than that of unfermented
beans. The content either on fermented or unfermented cocoa beans and either infested or not decreased
during storage. Free fatty acid content on cocoa beans infested with Â£.Â cautella was higher and
significantly different than that on not infested. The content for both types increased during storage.
Key Words :Â Â Cocoa beans / Fermentation / Ephestia cautella I Moisture content / Fungal population /
Insect-damaged beans / Mouldy beans / Lipid / Free fatty acid.
Download data is not yet available.
How to Cite
S. DHARMAPUTRA, O., SUNJAYA, S., RETNOWATI, I., & AMBARWATI, S. (2011). STORED COCOA BEANS QUALITY AFFECTED BY FERMENTATION AND EPHESTIA CAUTELLA WALKER (LEPIDOPTERA: PHYCITIDAE) INFESTATION. BIOTROPIA - The Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Biology, (15). https://doi.org/10.11598/btb.2000.0.15.159
Authors who publish with this journal agree with the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work 1 year after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons attribution-noncommerical-noderivates 4.0 International License that allows others to share, copy and redistribute the work in any medium or format, but only where the use is for non-commercial purposes and an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal is mentioned.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).