<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.3" article-type="research-article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">1907-770X</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>BIOTROPIA</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title>BIOTROPIA</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1907-770X</issn><issn pub-type="ppub">0215-6334</issn><publisher><publisher-name>SEAMEO BIOTROP</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.11598/btb.2024.31.3.2284</article-id><article-categories/><title-group><article-title>CONSERVATION STATUS AND PROPAGATION OF Camellia dalatensis AND Camellia capitata BY CUTTINGS</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Hong</surname><given-names>En Le</given-names></name><address><country>Viet Nam</country><email>lehongen@gmail.com</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"/><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor-0"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Van</surname><given-names>Duong Do</given-names></name><address><country>Viet Nam</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Pham</surname><given-names>Doan Nguyen</given-names></name><address><country>Viet Nam</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Van</surname><given-names>Phuc Nguyen</given-names></name><address><country>Viet Nam</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Van</surname><given-names>Cam Ngo</given-names></name><address><country>Viet Nam</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Thuy</surname><given-names>Hoa Le Thi</given-names></name><address><country>Viet Nam</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Ba</surname><given-names>Trung Nguyen</given-names></name><address><country>Viet Nam</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Si</surname><given-names>Hung Ho</given-names></name><address><country>Viet Nam</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Giang</surname><given-names>Phi Ngo</given-names></name><address><country>Viet Nam</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Thanh</surname><given-names>Nguyen Nguyen</given-names></name><address><country>Viet Nam</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Thanh</surname><given-names>Truong Hoang</given-names></name><address><country>Viet Nam</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Quang</surname><given-names>Cuong Truong</given-names></name><address><country>Viet Nam</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-2"/></contrib><aff id="AFF-1">Forest Science Institute of Central Highlands and South of Central Vietnam, Da Lat City 66000, Lam Dong Province, Vietnam.</aff><aff id="AFF-2">Bidoup Nui Ba National Park, Da Lat City 66000, Lam Dong Province, Vietnam</aff></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Cahya</surname><given-names>Haritz</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Soerianegara</surname><given-names>Ms. Sri I.</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address></contrib></contrib-group><author-notes><corresp id="cor-0"><bold>Corresponding author: En Le Hong</bold>, Forest Science Institute of Central Highlands and South of Central Vietnam, Da Lat City 66000, Lam Dong Province, Vietnam. .Email:<email>lehongen@gmail.com</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2024-12-10" publication-format="electronic"><day>10</day><month>12</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>391</fpage><lpage>401</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2024-6-20"><day>20</day><month>6</month><year>2024</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2024-9-10"><day>10</day><month>9</month><year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright (c) 2024 En Le Hong , Duong Do Van, Doan Nguyen Pham, Phuc Nguyen Van, Cam Ngo Van, Hoa Le Thi Thuy, Trung Nguyen Ba, Hung Ho Si, Phi Ngo Giang, Nguyen Nguyen Thanh, Truong Hoang Thanh, Cuong Truong Quang</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder>En Le Hong , Duong Do Van, Doan Nguyen Pham, Phuc Nguyen Van, Cam Ngo Van, Hoa Le Thi Thuy, Trung Nguyen Ba, Hung Ho Si, Phi Ngo Giang, Nguyen Nguyen Thanh, Truong Hoang Thanh, Cuong Truong Quang</copyright-holder><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0</ali:license_ref><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.Authors who publish with this journal agree with the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work 1 year after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons attribution-noncommerical-noderivates 4.0 International License that allows others to share, copy and redistribute the work in any medium or format, but only where the use is for non-commercial purposes and an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal is mentioned.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journal.biotrop.org/index.php/biotropia/article/view/propagation-of-camellia-dalatensis-and-camellia-capitata" xlink:title="CONSERVATION STATUS AND PROPAGATION OF Camellia dalatensis AND Camellia capitata BY CUTTINGS">CONSERVATION STATUS AND PROPAGATION OF Camellia dalatensis AND Camellia capitata BY CUTTINGS</self-uri><abstract><sec><title>Article Highlights</title><p><italic>Camellia dalatensis</italic> and <italic>Camellia capitata</italic> are critically endangered species.- Habitat loss and deforestation threaten the survival of these <italic>Camellia</italic> species.- Vegetative propagation aids conservation of critically endangered <italic>Camellia</italic> species.- Rooting success depends on cutting types, growth regulators, and substrate mix.- Research aids conservation efforts for Vietnam’s rare and vulnerable flora.</p></sec><sec><title>Abstract</title><p><italic>Camellia dalatensis</italic> (V. D. Luong, Ninh &amp; Hakoda) and <italic>Camellia capitata</italic> (Orel, Curry &amp; Luu) are classified as critically endangered (CR) by the IUCN. Conservation solutions for these two species have not yet been fully implemented, while wild populations are declining. This research on vegetative propagation examined the efficacy of indole-3-butyric acid (IBA in solution or in powdered activated charcoal), cutting types (terminal shoot or stem cuttings), and substrates for the growth of cuttings (sand-coir dust mixes) on rooting efficiency. The highest rooting of <italic>C. dalatensis</italic> was observed in terminal shoot cuttings at 1,000 ppm IBA, and 25% sand and 75% coir dust substrate. Maximum values obtained were survival 95.6%, rooting percentage 88.9%, number of roots per cutting 6.9, root length 6.2 cm, and rooting index 42.9. For <italic>C. capitata</italic>, superior rooting was obtained with semi-hardwood cuttings, at 1,500 ppm IBA, and equal parts of sand and coir dust as substrate. <italic>Camellia capitata</italic> was more difficult to root, with maximum values of 65.6% survival, 52.2% rooting, 2.8 roots per cutting, 2.9 cm root length, and rooting index of 8.1. The results of this study can be used to support further propagation and conservation of these two endangered species.</p></sec></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Camellia dalatensis</kwd><kwd>Camellia capitata</kwd><kwd>cuttings</kwd><kwd>IBA</kwd><kwd>rooting</kwd></kwd-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>File created by JATS Editor</meta-name><meta-value><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://jatseditor.com" xlink:title="JATS Editor">JATS Editor</ext-link></meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec><title>INTRODUCTION</title><p>Camellia L., the largest genus in the Theaceae family, is widely distributed from Bhutan, Northeast India, China, and Japan to Indonesia and the Philippines <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-5">(Chang &amp; Bartholomew, 1984)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-15">(Ming &amp; Bartholomew, 2007)</xref>. Vietnam has a high diversity of Camellia and many species have been recently recorded, such as C. hiepii, C. hoaana, C. hoabinhensis, C. maianhii, C. pyriformis, and C. vanlangensis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-31">(, 2020)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-21">(Quach et al., 2024)</xref>. Camellia dalatensis was described in 2012 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-29">(Tran &amp; Luong, 2012)</xref> and C. capitata in 2014 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-20">(Orel et al., 2014)</xref>. These two species are classified as critically endangered (CR) by the IUCN, with low regeneration potential due to habitat changes under the impacts of climate change and human impacts, such as deforestation from shifting cultivation and overexploitation. Therefore, more quantitative information on the status and conservation strategies of these threatened Camellia is needed <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-23">(Rivers &amp; Luu, 2018)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-20">(Orel et al., 2014)</xref>.</p><p>Propagation is one of the important components to provide seedlings for species conservation and development programs. Each propagation method has its advantages and disadvantages. Propagation from seeds is easy to implement. However, these two species have disadvantages in implementing seed propagation, i.e., these two species have a small number of individuals, poor fruiting ability, and seasonal seed availability. Propagation via tissue culture has the potential to produce a large number of plants, but this technique requires high technology, high costs, and a long time to conduct. A cheaper alternative approach is to use cuttings for propagating these two Camellia species, in which this technique has the advantage of preserving the genetic characteristics of the mother trees.</p><p>Propagation by using cuttings has been successful for other indigenous Camellia species in Vietnam, including C. chrysantha, C. flava, C. petelotii, and C. tamdaoensis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-18">(Nguyen et al., 2017)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-19">(Nguyen et al., 2021)</xref>. The aims of this study were: 1) to assess the conservation status of C. dalatensis and C. capitata in the field and 2) to determine the effects of auxin, cutting types, and substrates on root formation of the cuttings. The research results will contribute to supporting the propagation and conservation of these two threatened species of Camellia.</p></sec><sec><title>MATERIALS AND METHODS</title><sec><title>Assessment of Conservation Status</title><p>A survey of C. dalatensis and C. capitata was undertaken using the snowball sampling approach with 15 respondents (5 forest managers, 5 ethnic people living near the forest boundary, and 5 forest planters). Before completing the interview, all respondents were freely consented.</p><p>The interview questionnaire had three questions: (1) Have you ever seen these two plant species?; (2) Where did you see these two plant species?; and (3) How many people know about these two species at this location? Following the interviews, we established 5 survey transects per species, each ranging in length from 2 to 3 km, to locate mature trees.</p><p>The program <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://geocat.kew.org/editor" xlink:title="http://geocat.kew.org/editor ">http://geocat.kew.org/editor </ext-link><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-25">(Gardens, 2024)</xref> and the IUCN Red List Criteria and Classification Guidelines <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-12">(Standards &amp; Subcommittee, 2022)</xref>( <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/" xlink:title="http://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/ ">http://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/ </ext-link>RedListGuidelines.pdf) were used to calculate the Extent of Occurrence (EOO) and Area of Occupancy (AOO).</p></sec><sec><title>Cutting Experiments</title><sec><title>Source of Mother Trees</title><p>C. dalatensis was obtained from natural forest in Tram Hanh Commune, Da Lat City, Lam Dong Province, Vietnam. C. capitata was gathered from natural forests in Phuoc Cat Commune, Cat Tien District, Lam Dong Province, Vietnam.</p></sec><sec><title>Sample Collection and Processing</title><p>The branches of C. capitata and C. dalatensis were gathered in January and May of 2022, respectively. Branches with a diameter of 0.5-0.8 cm were chopped into 50-60 cm long sections, placed in foam crates, moistened with wet towels, and then transported to Da Lat City. The stems were rinsed multiple times in clean water before being cut around 1 cm from the node into 10-15 cm long portions for the research trials.</p></sec><sec><title>Location of Propagation Experiments</title><p>The propagation experiments were set up in a greenhouse at the Forest Science Institute of Central Highlands and South of Central Vietnam (FSIH), Da Lat City, Lam Dong Province, Vietnam (11o56’35” N, 108o24’23” E). The altitude of the nursery was 1,504 m, the average annual temperature was 18-25 oC, the average annual rainfall was about 2,200 mm, and the wet season happened from May to November. The misting mode in the greenhouse was set up at 20 seconds every 2 hours.</p></sec></sec><sec><title>Experimental Design</title><sec><title>Experiment 1 - Effect of IBA on Root Formation</title><p>The experiment was undertaken with 2 types of indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) in solution and IBA powder combined with activated charcoal. Five concentrations of IBA solution were prepared (0; 500; 1,000; 1,500; and 2,000 ppm) in water. The cuttings were submerged in the IBA solution for 15 minutes. IBA-activated charcoal treatments were 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0%. The IBA was dissolved in a small volume of alcohol and then mixed with activated charcoal to form a slurry. The slurries were dried to evaporate the alcohol and then were ground and passed through a sieve (0.35 mm mesh size). The cuttings were briefly dipped into the powder. Experiments were carried out using washed river sand in rectangular plastic drainage baskets with dimensions of 35 cm (length) x 26 cm (width) x 10 cm (height). Rooting development was assessed on day 120.</p></sec><sec><title>Experiment 2 - Effect of Cutting Types on Root Formation</title><p>The experiment compared two treatments of cutting types, i.e., terminal shoot and semi-hard- wood stem cuttings. Sand substrate was used in combination with the optimal result of IBA in experiment 1. Rooting development was assessed on day 120.</p></sec><sec><title>Experiment 3 - Effect of Substrates on Root Formation</title><p>Four treatments of substrates were applied, i.e., 75% sand and 25% coir dust, 50% sand and</p><p>50% coir dust, 25% sand and 75% coir dust, and 100% coir dust. Rooting development was assessed on day 90.</p></sec></sec><sec><title>Data Analysis</title><p>The experiments were conducted in a randomized block design with three replications. The data measured were survival percentage (%), rooting percentage (%), number of roots, root length (cm), and rooting index (number of roots multiplied by root length). The data were analyzed using the Duncan test in SPSS 26.0.0 software (Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 26).</p></sec></sec><sec><title>RESULTS AND DISCUSSION</title><sec><title>Conservation Status</title><p>Camellia dalatensis has a narrow distribution in Phat Chi Village, Tram Hanh Commune, Da Lat City, Lam Dong Province. The number of mature individuals in the natural habitat was 205 plants. The Extent of Occurrence (EOO: 0.464 km2) and Area of Occupancy (AOO: 8,000 km2) for Critically Endangered (CR) C. dalatensis are</p><p>illustrated in  <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-2">Figure 1</xref>(upper panel). Camellia capitata occurs in Cat Tien National Park, an area managed by Lam Dong Province (Cat Tien District). There were 5 mature plants in the natural habitat. C. capitata is categorized as Critically Endangered (CR) with EOO of 0.050 km2 and AOO of 4,000 km2 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-2">Figure 1</xref>; lower panel). Both C. dalatensis and C. capitata were shown to have a very small distribution area (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-3">Figure 2 </xref>), which were threatened by logging, deforestation, planting of industrial crops, such as cashew, rubber and coffee, and the harvesting of non-timber forest products <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-2">(Beech et al., 2017)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-20">(Orel et al., 2014)</xref>. Recently, the forests are being exploited for medicinal herbs and ornamental plants with high polyphenol contents and beautiful flowers, including these two Camellia species (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-4">Figure 3</xref>) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-34">(Trinh, 2022)</xref>.</p></sec><sec><title>Effect of IBA on Root Formation of C. dalatensis and C. capitata</title><p>Asexual propagation by using cuttings is the optimal solution for preserving genetic characteristics from mature plants when propagation by using seeds is limited by low fecundity. There are many factors affecting rooting, including the environment, the types of cuttings used for propagation, and the use of plant growth regulators (PGRs) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-3">(Bhupathireddy et al., 2022)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-6">(Dewi &amp; Sabhara, 2022)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-7">(Eed &amp; Burgoyne, 2014)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-9">(, 2022)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-10">(Griffin et al., 1998)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-22">(Ray &amp; Ali, 2017)</xref>). Cutting propagation efficiency is often increased by using exogenous PGRs, including IBA treatments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-3">(Bhupathireddy et al., 2022)</xref>;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-9">(, 2022)</xref>. However, the optimum concentrations and PGR forms (solution or solid form) can differ markedly between species. For example, 1,000 ppm IBA in solution gave the best results in Lycium barbarum L., but 1% IBA was optimal for Cornus mas L. (Çelik &amp; Çetin 2021). In this study, 1,000 ppm IBA was suitable for C. dalatensis, but C. capitata required a higher concentration of 1,500 ppm IBA for obtaining the highest rooting percentage.</p><fig id="figure-2"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p>Extent of Occurrence (EOO) and Area of Occupancy (AOO) of Camellia dalatensis (upper panel) and C. capitata (lower panel)</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://journal.biotrop.org/index.php/biotropia/article/download/propagation-of-camellia-dalatensis-and-camellia-capitata/version/2775/859/12013/CONSERVATION_STATUS_AND_PROPAGATION_OF_Camellia_dalatensis_AND_Camellia_capitata_BY_CUTTINGS-g1.jpg" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="jpg"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig><fig id="figure-3"><label>Figure 2 </label><caption><p>Appearance of Camellia capitata and C. dalatensis</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://journal.biotrop.org/index.php/biotropia/article/download/propagation-of-camellia-dalatensis-and-camellia-capitata/version/2775/859/12014/CONSERVATION_STATUS_AND_PROPAGATION_OF_Camellia_dalatensis_AND_Camellia_capitata_BY_CUTTINGS-g2.png" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="png"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig><fig id="figure-4"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p>Comparisons on survival and rooting percentages for cuttings dipped in liquid IBA or IBA in charcoal for Camellia dalatensis (a) and C. capitata (b)</p></caption><p>Notes: a. Seedlings of C. dalatensis in their natural habitat; b. Flower of C. dalatensis; c. Flower of C. capitata; d. Seedlings of C. capitata in their natural habitat.</p><graphic xlink:href="https://journal.biotrop.org/index.php/biotropia/article/download/propagation-of-camellia-dalatensis-and-camellia-capitata/version/2775/859/12015/CONSERVATION_STATUS_AND_PROPAGATION_OF_Camellia_dalatensis_AND_Camellia_capitata_BY_CUTTINGS-g3.png" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="png"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig><p>Differences in PGR requirements for the rooting of cuttings not only vary between plant species, but also depend on the position in the plant where the cuttings are sourced. Cuttings taken from mature trees often have reduced endogenous auxin content compared to cuttings taken from juvenile plants. Hence, it is necessary to undertake experiments on cuttings responses toward PGR dosages to ensure that optimal PGR dosages are being used for the correct cutting type. Also, at very high concentrations, the rooting efficiency can be significantly reduced, such as in Prunus laurocerasus L. at 2 g/L IBA <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-28">(Sulusoglu &amp; Cavusoglu, 2010)</xref>. Thus, depending on the type of tree and the age of the tree, the rooting auxin treatment needs to be adjusted to the appropriate concentration, and it is necessary to have specific studies for each tree species.</p><p>The effectiveness of using IBA in propagation of threatened Camellia species are shown in Tables 1 and 2. There were significant (P &lt; 0.05) effects of IBA rates on survival percentage, rooting percentage, number of roots, root length, and rooting index.</p><p>For C. dalatensis, the survival percentage ranged from 65.56% to 80%; the rooting percentage ranged from 14.45% to 45.56%; the number of roots ranged from 0.57 to 3.80; the root length ranged from 1.67 cm to 4.23 cm; and the rooting index ranged from 1.12 to 16.32. The most effective treatment was 1,000 ppm IBA. For C. capitata, the survival percentage ranged from 28.89% to 40.00%; the rooting percentage ranged from 7.78% to 31.11%; the number of roots ranged from 0.30 to 1.90; the root length ranged from 0.40 cm to 2.13 cm; and the rooting index ranged from 0.15 to 4.09. The most effective treatment was 1,500 ppm IBA.</p><table-wrap id="table-1"><label>Table 1 </label><caption><p>Effect of IBA concentration on Camellia dalatensis root formation</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">Treatment</th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>Survival percentage (%)</p></th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>Rooting percentage (%)</p></th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>Number of roots per cutting</p></th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>Root length (cm)</p></th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>Rooting index</p></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">500 ppm</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>74.45±2.22ab</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>32.22±2.94bc</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>1.73±0.35bcd</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>2.43±0.15b</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>4.29±1.11c</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">1,000 ppm</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>77.78±1.11ab</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>45.56±2.94a</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>3.80±0.32a</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>4.23±0.38a</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>16.32±2.76a</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">1,500 ppm</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>76.67±1.93ab</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>37.78±4.01ab</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>3.73±0.90a</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>2.90±0.75b</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>11.72±4.83ab</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">2,000 ppm</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>76.67±1.93ab</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>31.11±2.94bc</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>2.50±0.61ab</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>2.80±0.45b</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>6.85±2.06bc</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">0.5%</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>72.22±2.94b</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>22.22±2.94de</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>1.33±0.12bcd</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>2.87±0.15b</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>3.85±0.50c</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">1.0%</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>80.00±1.92a</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>35.56±1.11b</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>2.10±0.35bc</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>2.83±0.38b</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>5.73±0.65bc</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">1.5%</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>77.78±1.11ab</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>25.55±2.22cd</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>2.07±0.19bc</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>2.57±0.46b</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>5.29±1.10bc</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">2.0%</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>65.56±1.11c</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>20.00±1.92de</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>0.63±0.29cd</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>1.70±0.32b</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>1.12±0.67c</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">Not using PGRs</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>74.44±1.11ab</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>14.45±2.22e</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>0.57±0.42d</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>1.67±0.22b</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>1.12±0.91c</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">Mean</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>75.06±0.93</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>29.38±1.95</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p><italic>2.05 </italic>±0.25</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p><italic>2.67 </italic>±0.18</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p><italic>6.25 </italic>±1.10c</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">P-value</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>0.001</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>0.000</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>0.000</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>0.012</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>0.001</p></td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Notes: *Mean values in columns followed by different letters are statistically significantly different with P ≤ 0.05 using Duncan’s multiple range test.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table-2"><label>Table 2 </label><caption><p>Effect of IBA concentration on Camellia capitata root formation</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">Treatment</th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>Survival percentage (%)</p></th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">Rooting percentage (%)</th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">Number of roots per cutting</th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>Root length (cm)</p></th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>Rooting index</p></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">500 ppm</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>38.89±1.11ab</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">16.67±1.93c</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">0.83±0.90bcd</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>1.67±0.12c</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>0.99±0.21bc</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">1,000 ppm</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>40.00±1.92a</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">25.55±2.22b</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">1.37±0.12ab</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>1.53±0.12bc</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>2.10±0.25b</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">1,500 ppm</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>40.00±1.92a</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">31.11±1.11a</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">1.90±0.15a</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>2.13±0.24a</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>4.09±0.70a</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">2,000 ppm</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>31.11±1.11bcd</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">25.57±1.11b</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">0.87±0.09bcd</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>1.23±0.27c</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>1.05±0.23bc</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">0.5%</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>36.67±3.85abc</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">13.33±1.93c</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">0.57±0.09cd</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>1.23±0.12c</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>0.68±0.06bc</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">1.0%</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>32.22±2.94abcd</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">14.44±1.11c</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">1.00±0.47bc</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>1.80±0.15ab</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>1.94±1.05b</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">1.5%</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>32.22±4.01abcd</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">14.44±2.94c</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">1.40±0.21ab</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>1.23±0.90c</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>1.71±0.23b</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">2.0%</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>26.67±1.93d</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">11.11±1.11cd</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">0.97±0.15d</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>1.00±0.21c</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>1.02±0.35bc</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">Not using PGRs</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>28.89±2.22cd</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">7.78±1.11d</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">0.30±0.26</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>0.40±0.12d</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>0.15±0.11c</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">Mean</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p><italic>34.07 </italic>±1.16</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><italic>17.78 </italic>±1.52</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><italic>1.02 </italic>±0.54</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p><italic>1.30 </italic>±0.10</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p><italic>1.53 </italic>±0.25</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">P-value</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>0.009</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">0.000</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">0.001</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>0.000</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>0.001</p></td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Notes: *Mean values in columns followed by different letters are statistically significantly different with P ≤ 0.05 using Duncan’s multiple range test.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><p>For C. dalatensis and C. capitata, the liquid growth regulator was more effective compared to the charcoal powder in promoting rooting. Results on survival percentage and rooting percentage are compared in (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-5">Figure 4</xref>).</p><p>Liquid IBA solutions are easy to prepare, while the phloem and xylem of cuttings have better access to exogenous hormones than hormones combined with powders. However, powder containing activated charcoal is an effective adsorbent for many pollutants (organic, inorganic, microbial, and biological) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-16">(Mohammad-Khah &amp; Ansari, 2009)</xref>. Therefore, when the activated charcoal- contained powder is dry-mixed with a plant growth regulator, the dry mix can reduce infection. Therefore, in this research, we sought to identify the most effective treatment, whether the activated charcoal-contained powder or liquid plant growth regulator.</p></sec><sec><title>Effect of Cutting Types on Root Formation</title><p>Cutting types are divided into softwood (non- lignified) cuttings, semi-hardwood (partly lignified) cuttings, and hardwood (lignified portion) cuttings <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-10">(Griffin et al., 1998)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-11">(Islam et al., 2010)</xref>. Most propagators of woody plants use semi-hardwood cuttings for higher rooting efficiency compared to softwood and hardwood cuttings <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-1">(Alkaç et al., 2022)</xref>.</p><p>In each cutting type, the cutting position, whether terminal shoot or stem cuttings, also has a great impact on rooting efficiency. In most species, cuttings from terminal shoot have higher rooting efficiency. However, the use of appropriate plant growth regulators can affect the rooting efficiency of stem cuttings and ensure propagation efficiency with the number of rooted cuttings higher than that of the terminal shoot cuttings <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-27">(Solikin, 2019)</xref>. Choosing the right cuttings for propagation and increasing the efficiency of propagation are necessary solutions.</p><p>For some Camellia spp., it is common to choose semi-hardwood cuttings because this cutting type provides the best results. In this study, semi- hardwood cutting was used and divided into terminal shoot cuttings and stem cuttings (Tables 3 and 4).</p><fig id="figure-5"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p>Rootings of Camellia cuttings</p></caption><p>Notes: DD = IBA solution, DR = IBA powder, DC = no IBA.</p><graphic xlink:href="https://journal.biotrop.org/index.php/biotropia/article/download/propagation-of-camellia-dalatensis-and-camellia-capitata/version/2775/859/12016/CONSERVATION_STATUS_AND_PROPAGATION_OF_Camellia_dalatensis_AND_Camellia_capitata_BY_CUTTINGS-g4.png" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="png"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig><table-wrap id="table-3"><label>Table 3 </label><caption><p>Effect of cutting types on Camellia dalatensis root formation</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">Treatment</th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>Survival percentage (%)</p></th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>Rooting percentage (%)</p></th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>Number of roots per cutting</p></th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>Root length (cm)</p></th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>Rooting index</p></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">TC</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>90.00±1.92</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>58.89±1.11</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>5.10±0.59</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>4.50±0.12</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>23.08±3.20</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">SC</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>67.78±2.94</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>31.11±2.94</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>1.97±0.15</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>2.33±0.20</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>4.62±0.62</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">Mean</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p><italic>78.88 </italic>±5.21</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p><italic>45.00 </italic>±6.39</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p><italic>3.53 </italic>±0.75</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p><italic>3.42 </italic>±0.50</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p><italic>13.85 </italic>±4.38</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">P-value</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>0.003</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>0.001</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>0.007</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>0.001</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>0.005</p></td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Notes: *Mean values in columns followed by different letters are statistically significantly different with P ≤ 0.05 using Duncan’s multiple range test; TC = Terminal shoot cuttings; SC = Stem cuttings.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table-6"><label>Table 4</label><caption><p>Effect of cutting type on Camellia capitata root formation</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>Treatment</p></th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>Survival percentage</p><p>(%)</p></th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>Rooting percentage</p><p>(%)</p></th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>Number of roots per cu tting</p></th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>Root length</p><p>(cm)</p></th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>Rooting index</p></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>TC</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>45.56±1.11</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>25.56±1.11</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>1.80±0.06</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>1.87±0.19</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>3.36±0.37</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>SC</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>37.78±2.22</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>34.45±2.22</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>1.50±0.06</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>2.00±0.10</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>3.00±0.19</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>Mean</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>41.67±2.06</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>30.00±2.28</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>1.65±0.08</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>1.93±0.10</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>3.18±0.20</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>P-value</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>0.035</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>0.023</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>0.021</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>0.056</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>0.436</p></td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Notes: *Mean values in columns followed by different letters are statistically significantly different with P≤0.05 using Duncan’s multiple range test; TC = Terminal shoot cuttings; SC = Stem cuttings.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><p>Based on Experiment 1, the IBA concentrations used were 1,000 ppm for C. dalatensis and 1,500 ppm for C. capitata. The parameters of survival percentage, rooting percentage, number of roots, root length, and rooting index were significantly different for C. dalatensis (P &lt; 0.05). Terminal shoot cuttings provided better results compared to stem cuttings with the survival percentage of 90.00% compared to 67.78%, the rooting percentage reaching 58.89% compared to 31.11%, 5.10 roots per cutting compared to 1.97 roots per cutting, the root length reached 4.50 cm compared to 2.33 cm, the rooting index reached 23.08 compared to 4.62. Similar results have been reported by Wazir (2014) in propagating C. japonica by using terminal cuttings with 1,000 ppm IBA where the highest percentage of rooting was 84.96%, and the longest root length was 18.3 cm. For C. capitata, the parameters of survival percentage, rooting percentage, and number of roots per cutting were significantly different (P &lt; 0.05). However, root length and rooting index were not statistically significantly different (P &gt; 0.05). The survival percentage of terminal shoot cuttings compared to stem cuttings was 45.56% compared to 37.78%. However, the rooting index for terminal shoot cuttings was about 9% lower than that of stem cuttings (25.56% versus 34.45%), and the number of roots per cutting was 1.80 compared to 1.50. The root length ranged from 1.87 cm to 2.00 cm (average 1.93 cm) and the rooting index range was</p><p>3.00 to 3.36 (average 3.18) for both cutting types.</p><p>Comparing the rooting parameters, the effective cutting type for C. capitata propagation was semi- hardwood stem cuttings. At the time of gathering cuttings in the field, the C. capitata had begun to sprout. Therefore, the terminal shoot cuttings were very immature and weak, so they were easy to be infected by fungi. Besides, we collected the stem cuttings at the same time that the cuttings were partially lignifying, to have better auxin synthesis; thereby, the rooting percentage of stem cuttings was higher than that of terminal shoot cuttings in C. capitata.</p></sec><sec><title>Effect of Substrates on Root Formation</title><p>The growing substrate environment should have good porosity to support smooth water draining and provide a suitable temperature and humidity regimes for root development. The substrate media can be combined with other factors, such as plant growth regulators and cutting types, to bring the highest efficiency to the propagation process <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-13">(Johnson et al., 2005)</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-26">(Silva et al., 2012)</xref>.</p><p>The selected growing substrate for propagation in this study was a mixture of sand and coir dust. Sand ensures good drainage, and coir dust improves water retention in the rooting environment. In this experiment, 1,000 ppm IBA was used for semi- hardwood cuttings of C. dalatensis, while 1,500 ppm IBA was used for semi-hardwood cuttings of C. capitata. Rooting results are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-4">Table 5</xref>(C. dalatensis), <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-5">Table 6</xref>(C. capitata), and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-6">Figure 5</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table-4"><label>Table 5</label><caption><p>Effect of substrate type on Camellia dalatensis root formation</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle"><p>Treatment</p></th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle"><p>Survival percentage</p><p>(%)</p></th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle"><p>Rooting percentage</p><p>(%)</p></th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle"><p>Number of roots per cutting</p></th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle"><p>Root length</p><p>(cm)</p></th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle"><p>Rooting index</p></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>A1</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>94.44±1.11</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>75.56±1.11<sup>c</sup></p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>4.93±0.30<sup>c</sup></p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>4.60±0.06<sup>c</sup></p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>22.73±1.65<sup>c</sup></p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>A2</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>95.56±2.94</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>83.33±1.93<sup>b</sup></p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>5.13±0.18<sup>bc</sup></p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>5.33±0.15<sup>b</sup></p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>27.41±1.47<sup>bc</sup></p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>A3</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>95.56±1.11</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>88.89±2.22a</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>6.87±0.27a</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>6.23±0.15a</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>42.88±2.71a</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>A4</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>95.56±2.94</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>81.11±1.11<sup>b</sup></p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>6.10±0.50<sup>ab</sup></p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>5.60±0.20<sup>b</sup></p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>34.26±3.59<sup>b</sup></p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>Mean</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>95.28±0.10</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>82.22±1.61</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>5.76±0.27</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>5.44±0.19</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>31.82±2.53</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>P-value</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>0.978</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>0.003</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>0.011</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>0.000</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>0.002</p></td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Notes: *Mean values in columns followed by different letters are statistically significantly different with P ≤ 0.05 using Duncan’s multiple range test; A1 = 75% sand and 25% coir dust; A2 = 50% sand and 50% coir dust; A3 = 25% sand and 75% coir dust; A4 = 100% coir dust.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table-5"><label>Table 6</label><caption><p>Effect of substrate type on Camellia capitata root formation</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle"><p>Treatment</p></th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle"><p>Survival percentage</p><p>(%)</p></th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle"><p>Rooting percentage</p><p>(%)</p></th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle"><p>Number of roots per cutting</p></th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle"><p>Root length</p><p>(cm)</p></th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle"><p>Rooting index</p></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>A1</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>64.45±2.22</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>47.78±2.22</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>2.03±0.09<sup>b</sup></p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>2.33±0.12<sup>b</sup></p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>4.72±0.05<sup>b</sup></p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>A2</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>65.55±2.22</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>52.22±2.94</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>2.83±0.20a</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>2.87±0.17a</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>8.12±0.69a</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>A3</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>65.56±2.94</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>53.33±1.93</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>2.57±1.19<sup>a</sup></p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>1.83±0.07<sup>c</sup></p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>4.73±0.50<sup>b</sup></p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>A4</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>66.66±3.33</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>52.22±2.22</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>2.57±0.33<sup>a</sup></p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>1.77±0.09<sup>c</sup></p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>4.54±0.28<sup>b</sup></p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>Mean</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>65.56±1.84</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>51.39±1.19</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>2.50±0.11</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>2.20±0.14</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>5.53±0.49</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>P-value</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>0.952</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>0.406</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>0.026</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>0.001</p></td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>0.001</p></td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Notes: *Mean values in columns followed by different letters are statistically significantly different with P</p><p>≤ 0.05 using Duncan’s multiple range test; A1 = 75% sand and 25% coir dust; A2 = 50% sand and 50% coir dust; A3 = 25% sand and 75% coir dust; A4 = 100% coir dust.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><p>For C. dalatensis, there was no statistically significant differences in survival percentage (P &gt; 0.05) between treatments, with a mean value of 95.28%. However, rooting percentage, number of roots, root length, and rooting index were significantly different (P &lt; 0.05). Rooting percentage ranged from 75.56% to 88.89% (average 82.22), number of roots per cutting ranged from 4.93 to 6.78 (average 5.76), root length ranged from 4.60 cm to 6.23 cm (average 5.44 cm), and rooting index ranged from 22.73 to 42.88 (average 31.82).</p><p>The treatment with the best results for C. dalatensis was 25% sand:75% coir dust, which may be related to the wet environment where this species occurs. C. dalatensis was distributed in Dalat City which has high humidity and high annual rainfall. For C. capitata, there was no significant difference between the survival and rooting percentages (P &gt; 0.05), the average survival percentage was 65.56% and the average rooting percentage was 51.39%. The number of roots per cutting ranged from 2.03 to 2.83 (average 2.50), the root length ranged from 1.77 cm to 2.87 cm (average 5.44 cm) and the rooting index ranged from 4.54 to 8.12 (mean 5.53). Treatment with the best results for C. capitata was the treatment with equal parts of sand and coir dust. C. capitata occurs in Cat Tien District which has lower humidity and rainfall compared to that in Dalat City. Therefore, this species was able to grow better in the medium which had similar conditions to their natural habitat.</p><p>The effects of media types and composition on rooting efficiency have been reported in many plants <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-7">(Eed &amp; Burgoyne, 2014)</xref>. Air content and oxygen diffusion rate in media are important for rooting <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-8">(Ercisli et al., 2002)</xref>. The characteristics of the species also influence rooting success. In particular, Camellia impressinervis grows well in high moisture and well drained soil <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-30">(Tran, 2018)</xref>, in which their cuttings had the best rooting results in a growth medium of 100% sand with high air content and oxygen diffusion capacity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-31">(, 2020)</xref>.</p><fig id="figure-6"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p>Rootings of Camellia cuttings</p></caption><p>Notes: a. C. dalatensis terminal shoot cuttings with 1,000 ppm IBA in a substrate of 25% sand mixed with 75% coir dust; b.</p><p>C. capitata semi-hardwood stem cuttings with 1,500 ppm IBA in a substrate of 50% sand mixed with 50% coir dust.</p><graphic xlink:href="https://journal.biotrop.org/index.php/biotropia/article/download/propagation-of-camellia-dalatensis-and-camellia-capitata/version/2775/859/12017/CONSERVATION_STATUS_AND_PROPAGATION_OF_Camellia_dalatensis_AND_Camellia_capitata_BY_CUTTINGS-g5.png" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="png"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig></sec></sec><sec><title>CONCLUSION</title><p>Camellia capitata and C. dalatensis have very limited distributions area. The declining natural populations face the risk of extinction due to fragmentation, deforestation, illegal logging, and clearing for agriculture. Vegetative propagation protocols are essential to help domesticate these species and conserve genetic diversity. For propagation by using cuttings, root formation was effective using liquid IBA at 1,000 ppm for C. dalatensis and at 1,500 ppm for C. capitata. Rooting formation was the highest for terminal shoot cuttings of C. dalatensis and semi-hardwood stem cuttings of C. capitata. Sand and coir dust substrates with a ratio of 25:75% for C. dalatensis and 50:50% for C. capitata were the best substrates for root formation of cuttings.</p></sec></body><back><ack><title>ACKNOWLEDGMENTS</title><p>The authors would like to thank BCGI (Botanic Gardens Conservation International) for their financial support and the Southern Institute of Ecology, Forest Science Institute of Central Highlands and South of Central Vietnam, Cat Tien National Park, and Lam Vien Special-use Forest Management Board created the most favorable conditions for us to complete this study.</p></ack><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="BIBR-1"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effect of silver nanoparticles treatments on some characteristics of “Santander” lily cultivar</article-title><source>Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology</source><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Alkaç</surname><given-names>O.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Öcalan</surname><given-names>O.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Güneş</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>1024925102125</fpage><lpage>1284386</lpage><page-range>1024925102125-1284386</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-2"><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>The red list of Theaceae</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Beech</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Barstow</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rivers</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><publisher-name>Botanic Gardens Conservation International</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Richmond (UK</publisher-loc></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-3"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>The impact of IBA and various growing media on pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) hardwood cuttings: A review</article-title><source>Int J Botany Stud [Internet</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bhupathireddy</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Saxena</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sharma</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rao</surname><given-names>V.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kaur</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><ext-link xlink:href="https://www.botanyjournals.com/assets/archives/2022/vol7issue4/7-4-18-825.pdf" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="The impact of IBA and various growing media on pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) hardwood cuttings: A review">The impact of IBA and various growing media on pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) hardwood cuttings: A review</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-4"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effect of cutting time and IBA application on the rooting of Goji berry cuttings</article-title><source>Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences [Internet</source><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Çelik</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Çetin</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>294</fpage><lpage>304</lpage><page-range>294-304</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.29133/yyutbd.885250</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-5"><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Camellias</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chang</surname><given-names>H.T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bartholomew</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group><year>1984</year><publisher-name>Timber Press</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Portland (US</publisher-loc></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-6"><element-citation publication-type="paper-conference"><article-title>The effect of natural PGR combination on the growth of fig (Ficus carica L.) plant cuttings</article-title><source>IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science [Internet</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dewi</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sabhara</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><ext-link xlink:href="https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/985/1/012019/pdf" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="The effect of natural PGR combination on the growth of fig (Ficus carica L.) plant cuttings">The effect of natural PGR combination on the growth of fig (Ficus carica L.) plant cuttings</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-7"><element-citation publication-type="paper-conference"><article-title>Effect of different rooting media and plant growth regulators on rooting of jojoba (Simmondsia chinensis (Link) Schneider) semi-hard wood cuttings under plastic tunnel conditions</article-title><source>Proceedings: 2014 Feb; Bali (Indonesia): The International Conference on Agricultural, Ecological, and Medical Sciences</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Eed</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Burgoyne</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2014</year><fpage>6</fpage><lpage>7</lpage><page-range>6-7</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-8"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>The effects of IBA, rooting media and cutting collection time on rooting of kiwifruit</article-title><source>Gartenbauwissenschaft</source><volume>67</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ercisli</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Anapali</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Esisken</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sahin</surname><given-names>U.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2002</year><fpage>34</fpage><lpage>8</lpage><page-range>34-8</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-9"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effect of different concentrations of PGRs on shooting and survival of stem cuttings in Lemon (Citrus limon Burm.) cv. Pant lemon-1, under Western UP conditions</article-title><source>Biological Forum - An International Journal Sciences [Internet</source><year>2022</year><ext-link xlink:href="https://www.researchtrend.net/bfij/pdf/184%20Effect%20of%20different%20Concentrations%20of%20PGRs%20on%20Shooting%20and%20Survival%20of%20Stem%20Cuttings%20in%20Lemon%20_Citrus%20limon%20Burm._%20cv.%20Pant%20lemon-1,%20under%20Western%20U.P.%20conditions%20Prashant%20Gautam.pdf" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Effect of different concentrations of PGRs on shooting and survival of stem cuttings in Lemon (Citrus limon Burm.) cv. Pant lemon-1, under Western UP conditions">Effect of different concentrations of PGRs on shooting and survival of stem cuttings in Lemon (Citrus limon Burm.) cv. Pant lemon-1, under Western UP conditions</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-10"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Propagation of Thuja x ‘Green Giant’by stem cuttings: Effects of growth stage, type of cutting, and IBA treatment</article-title><source>J Environ Hortic [Internet</source><volume>16</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Griffin</surname><given-names>J.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Blazich</surname><given-names>F.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ranney</surname><given-names>T.G.</given-names></name></person-group><year>1998</year><page-range>10242660738-2898-164212</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-11"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Propagation potentials of genotypes and different physiological ages of stem cuttings in Jatropha curcas L</article-title><source>J Agric Sci [Internet</source><volume>2</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Islam</surname><given-names>A.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yaakob</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Anuar</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Osman</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2010</year><fpage>75</fpage><lpage>82</lpage><page-range>75-82</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5539/jas.v2n4p75</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-12"><element-citation publication-type=""><article-title>Guidelines for using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria (Version 15.1</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Standards</surname><given-names>I.U.C.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Subcommittee</surname><given-names>Petitions</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><ext-link xlink:href="https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/redlistguidelines" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Guidelines for using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria (Version 15.1">Guidelines for using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria (Version 15.1</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-13"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effect of substrates on rooting of stem cuttings of the endangered species Clematis socialis</article-title><source>HortScience [Internet</source><volume>40</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Johnson</surname><given-names>C.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Eakes</surname><given-names>D.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bruner</surname><given-names>L.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wright</surname><given-names>A.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sibley</surname><given-names>J.L.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2005</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21273/HORTSCI.40.3.875d</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-14"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effects of cutting type and a method of IBA application on rooting of softwood cuttings from elite tree of Cornelian cherry (Cornus mas L.) from Belgrade area</article-title><source>Silva Balcanica [Internet</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Marković</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Grbić</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Djukić</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2014</year><ext-link xlink:href="https://silvabalcanica.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/sb_1512014_4.pdf" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Effects of cutting type and a method of IBA application on rooting of softwood cuttings from elite tree of Cornelian cherry (Cornus mas L.) from Belgrade area">Effects of cutting type and a method of IBA application on rooting of softwood cuttings from elite tree of Cornelian cherry (Cornus mas L.) from Belgrade area</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-15"><element-citation publication-type="chapter"><article-title>Theaceae</article-title><source>Flora of China</source><volume>12</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ming</surname><given-names>T.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bartholomew</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2007</year><publisher-name>Science Press; St</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Beijing (CN</publisher-loc></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-16"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Activated charcoal: Preparation, characterization and applications: A review article</article-title><source>International Journal of ChemTech Research</source><volume>1</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mohammad-Khah</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ansari</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2009</year><fpage>859</fpage><lpage>64</lpage><page-range>859-64</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-17"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Camellia maianhii (Theaceae): A new species of red-flowered Camellia from the North Central coast region of Vietnam</article-title><source>J Bot Res [Internet</source><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nguyen</surname><given-names>T.T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Luong</surname><given-names>V.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Do</surname><given-names>N.D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>176</fpage><lpage>83</lpage><page-range>176-83</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.36959/771/576</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-18"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effects of plant growth regulators and external factors on the propagation of yellow flower Camellia from cuttings</article-title><source>Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Science</source><volume>15</volume><issue>11</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nguyen</surname><given-names>Nguyen</given-names></name><name><surname>TH</surname><given-names>Tran</given-names></name><name name-style="given-only"><given-names>V.H.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><fpage>1539</fpage><lpage>46</lpage><page-range>1539-46</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-19"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Rapid propagation of Tam Dao yellow tea (Camellia tamdaoensis Ninh et Hakoda) by using stem cutting on aeroponic system</article-title><source>Vietnam Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development</source><volume>18</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nguyen</surname><given-names>X.T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Vu</surname><given-names>T.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pham</surname><given-names>V.T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nguyen</surname><given-names>T.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nguyen</surname><given-names>H.T.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>186</fpage><lpage>94</lpage><page-range>186-94</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-20"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Four new species and two new sections of Camellia (Theaceae) from Vietnam</article-title><source>Novon: A Journal for Botanical Nomenclature [Internet</source><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Orel</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wilson</surname><given-names>P.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Curry</surname><given-names>A.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Luu</surname><given-names>H.T.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2014</year><fpage>307</fpage><lpage>18</lpage><page-range>307-18</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3417/2012076</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-21"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Camellia hoabinhensis (Theaceae: sect. Chrysantha), a new yellow-flowered species from Northern Vietnam</article-title><source>Dalat University Journal of Science [Internet</source><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Quach</surname><given-names>V.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tran</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hoang</surname><given-names>T.T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tagane</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>21</fpage><lpage>9</lpage><page-range>21-9</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.37569/DalatUniversity.14.1.1143(2024)</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-22"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Factors affecting macropropagation of bamboo with special reference to culm cuttings: A review update</article-title><source>New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science [Internet</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ray</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ali</surname><given-names>M.N.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40490-017-0097-z</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-23"><element-citation publication-type=""><article-title>Camellia dalatensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2018</article-title><volume>e.T70561528A70561545</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rivers</surname><given-names>M.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Luu</surname><given-names>H.T.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2018</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2305/IUCN.UK.2018-1.RLTS.T70561528A70561545.en</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-24"><element-citation publication-type=""><article-title>Camellia capitata. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2018</article-title><volume>e.T70424105A176937766</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rivers</surname><given-names>M.C.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2018</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2305/IUCN.UK.2018-1.RLTS.T70424105A176937766.en</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-25"><element-citation publication-type=""><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gardens</surname><given-names>Royal Botanic</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><ext-link xlink:href="http://geocat.kew.org/editor" ext-link-type="uri">http://geocat.kew.org/editor</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-26"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effect of substrate composition on rooting of cuttings of Hyptis suaveolens</article-title><source>Revista Brasileirade Ciencias Agrarias [Internet]. [cited</source><volume>7</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Silva</surname><given-names>R.C.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Maia</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Paiva</surname><given-names>E.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Silva</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Coelho</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Silva</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2012</year><fpage>219</fpage><lpage>25</lpage><page-range>219-25</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5039/agraria.v5i3a1245</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-27"><element-citation publication-type=""><article-title>Effect of node position and number of stem cutting on the growth and yield of ‘katuk</article-title><volume>6</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Solikin</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><fpage>126</fpage><lpage>35</lpage><page-range>126-35</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18860/elha.v6i4.6336</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-28"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Vegetative propagation of Cherry laurel (Prunus laurocerasus L.) using semi-hardwood cuttings</article-title><source>African Journal of Agricultural Research [Internet</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sulusoglu</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cavusoglu</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2010</year><ext-link xlink:href="https://academicjournals.org/journal/AJAR/article-full-text-pdf/784CF8229017" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Vegetative propagation of Cherry laurel (Prunus laurocerasus L.) using semi-hardwood cuttings">Vegetative propagation of Cherry laurel (Prunus laurocerasus L.) using semi-hardwood cuttings</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-29"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Camellia dalatensis: a new species and precious gene should be conserved</article-title><source>VNU Journal of Science (Natural Sciences and Technology</source><volume>28</volume><issue>2S</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tran</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Luong</surname><given-names>V.D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2012</year><fpage>34</fpage><lpage>5</lpage><page-range>34-5</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-30"><element-citation publication-type="report"><article-title>Overview of Golden Camellias in Cao Bang</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tran</surname><given-names>V.D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2018</year><publisher-loc>Hanoi, Vietnam</publisher-loc></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-31"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effect of exogenous hormone and rooting medium on cutting propagation of golden Camellia (Camellia impressinervis</article-title><source>J Appl Hortic [Internet]. [cited</source><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><year>2020</year><fpage>159</fpage><lpage>63</lpage><page-range>159-63</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.37855/jah.2020.v22i02.29</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-32"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Camellia pyriformis (Theaceae, section Calpandria), a new species from Northern Vietnam</article-title><source>Dalat University Journal of Science [Internet</source><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Trinh</surname><given-names>N.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hoang</surname><given-names>T.S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>13</fpage><lpage>20</lpage><page-range>13-20</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.37569/DalatUniversity.14.1.1160(2024)</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-33"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Camellia vanlangensis (Theaceae, Sect. ArcheCamellia), a new yellow-flowered species from Vietnam</article-title><source>Taiwania [Internet</source><volume>68</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Trinh</surname><given-names>N.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Luong</surname><given-names>V.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Le</surname><given-names>N.H.N.</given-names></name><name name-style="given-only"><given-names>PhamVT</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>465</fpage><lpage>71</lpage><page-range>465-71</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.6165/tai.2023.68.465</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-34"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Yellow Camellias: a review of chemical constituents and biological activities</article-title><source>Dalat University Journal of Science [Internet</source><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Trinh</surname><given-names>T.D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>117</fpage><lpage>44</lpage><page-range>117-44</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.37569/DalatUniversity.12.3.977(2022)</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-35"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effect of NAA and IBA on rooting of Camellia cuttings</article-title><source>International Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine [Internet</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wazir</surname><given-names>J.S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2014</year><page-range>8018192832965923170255</page-range><ext-link xlink:href="https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&amp;amp;type=pdf&amp;amp;doi=" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Effect of NAA and IBA on rooting of Camellia cuttings">Effect of NAA and IBA on rooting of Camellia cuttings</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-36"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Camellia hoaana (Theaceae, section Corallina), a new species from Bu Gia Map national park in Southern Vietnam</article-title><source>Dalat University Journal of Science [Internet</source><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>S.X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kieu</surname><given-names>D.T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Le</surname><given-names>T.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Khuong</surname><given-names>H.T.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>37</fpage><lpage>44</lpage><page-range>37-44</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.37569/DalatUniversity.14.1.1207(2024)</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
