<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.3" article-type="research-article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">1907-770X</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>BIOTROPIA</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title>BIOTROPIA</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1907-770X</issn><issn pub-type="ppub">0215-6334</issn><publisher><publisher-name>SEAMEO BIOTROP</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.11598/btb.2024.31.3.2214</article-id><article-categories/><title-group><article-title>IN VITRO PLANT REGENERATION THROUGH PROTOCORM-LIKE BODIES DERIVED FROM STEM THIN LAYER OF Anubias barteri var. nana Petite</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Le</surname><given-names>Giang K. T.</given-names></name><address><country>Viet Nam</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Nguyen</surname><given-names>Tinh V.</given-names></name><address><country>Viet Nam</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Tran</surname><given-names>Ngan K. T</given-names></name><address><country>Viet Nam</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Dang</surname><given-names>Vy T. H.</given-names></name><address><country>Viet Nam</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Nguyen</surname><given-names>Phong V.</given-names></name><address><country>Viet Nam</country><email>nvphong@hcmuaf.edu.vn</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"/><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor-4"/></contrib><aff id="AFF-1">Faculty of Biological Sciences, Nong Lam University, Ho Chi Minh City 72820, Vietnam</aff></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Cahya</surname><given-names>Haritz</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="editor"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9202-8382</contrib-id><name><surname>Ardiansyah</surname><given-names>Dr Rhomi</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref rid="EDITOR-AFF-1" ref-type="aff"/></contrib><aff id="EDITOR-AFF-1">Department of Forest Resources Conservation, Faculty of Forestry, Universitas Gadjah Mada</aff></contrib-group><author-notes><corresp id="cor-4"><bold>Corresponding author:  Phong V. Nguyen</bold>, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Nong Lam University, Ho Chi Minh City 72820, Vietnam .Email:<email>nvphong@hcmuaf.edu.vn</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2024-12-10" publication-format="electronic"><day>10</day><month>12</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>349</fpage><lpage>358</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2024-3-4"><day>4</day><month>3</month><year>2024</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2024-4-3"><day>3</day><month>4</month><year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright (c) 2024 Phong V. Nguyen, Giang K. T. Le, Tinh V. Nguyen, Ngan K. T Tran, Vy T. H. Dang</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Phong V. Nguyen, Giang K. T. Le, Tinh V. Nguyen, Ngan K. T Tran, Vy T. H. Dang</copyright-holder><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0</ali:license_ref><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.Authors who publish with this journal agree with the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work 1 year after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons attribution-noncommerical-noderivates 4.0 International License that allows others to share, copy and redistribute the work in any medium or format, but only where the use is for non-commercial purposes and an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal is mentioned.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journal.biotrop.org/index.php/biotropia/article/view/in-vitro-plant-regeneration-of-anubias-barteri-var-nana-petite" xlink:title="IN VITRO PLANT REGENERATION THROUGH PROTOCORM-LIKE BODIES DERIVED FROM STEM THIN LAYER OF Anubias barteri var. nana Petite">IN VITRO PLANT REGENERATION THROUGH PROTOCORM-LIKE BODIES DERIVED FROM STEM THIN LAYER OF Anubias barteri var. nana Petite</self-uri><abstract><sec><title>Article Highlights</title><p><list list-type="bullet"><list-item><p>Effective induction of PLBs from stem thin layer and shoot regeneration using specific BAP and auxin combinations.</p></list-item><list-item><p>Significant role of potato extract in enhancing shoot regeneration.</p></list-item><list-item><p>Highest shoot regeneration rate achieved with 3 mg/L BAP concentration.</p></list-item></list></p></sec><sec><title>Abstract</title><p><italic>Anubias barteri </italic>var. <italic>nana</italic> Petite, a highly valued ornamental aquatic plant in the <italic>Araceae</italic> family, faces challenges in vegetative propagation due to its slow multiplication rate. This study established a robust micropropagation protocol for rapid and efficient multiplication of <italic>A. barteri </italic>var. <italic>nana</italic> Petite. Explants were subjected to thorough sterilization, and shoot induction and multiplication were optimized using varying concentrations of Benzyl adenine (BA) on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium. Protocorm-like bodies (PLBs) were induced from transverse thin-layer explants using combinations of BAP and Naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA). PLB multiplication and shoot regeneration were achieved through a sequential culture protocol. In addition, the influence of potato extract on shoot regeneration and the role of Indole-3-butyric Acid (IBA) in root development were explored. This study demonstrated a 100% survival rate of regenerated shoots in aquariums. Ongoing research is focused on further enhancing PLB multiplication. This optimized micropropagation protocol holds promise for the large-scale production of <italic>A. barteri </italic>var. <italic>nana</italic> Petite, addressing the limitations of natural propagation.</p></sec></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Anubias barteri var. nana Petite</kwd><kwd>anubias</kwd><kwd>plant growth regulators</kwd><kwd>PLBs</kwd><kwd>shoot induction</kwd><kwd>shoot regeneration</kwd></kwd-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>File created by JATS Editor</meta-name><meta-value><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://jatseditor.com" xlink:title="JATS Editor">JATS Editor</ext-link></meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec><title>INTRODUCTION</title><p>Anubias barteri var. nana Petite holds significant commercial importance as a highly sought-after decorative aquatic plant within the Araceae family. This cultivated variant, renowned for its slow growth and cluster formation, typically ranging from 1 cm to 5 cm in height, has garnered popularity in both aquatic and ornamental settings <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-6">(George et al., 2015)</xref>.</p><p>Despite its aesthetic appeal, the natural propagation of A. barteri has proven inefficient, leading to numerous studies on micropropagation techniques, including in vitro multiplication <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-6">(George et al., 2015)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-7">(Huang et al., 1994)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-9">(Kanchanapoom et al., 2012)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-16">(Rittirat et al., 2021)</xref>, in vitro organogenesis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-25">(Surendra et al., 2019)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-15">(Rittirat et al., 2023)</xref>, and hydroponic culture <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-24">(Sholichah et al., 2020)</xref>. However, these efforts have resulted in an average shoot production ranging between 2 shoots to 5 shoots from a single shoot.</p><p>To address this limitation, the utilization of protocorm-like bodies (PLBs) presents a promising approach for mass production because of their rapid formation, uniform characteristics, disease-free nature, and sustainability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-2">(Cardoso et al., 2020)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-23">(Sheelavanthmath et al., 2005)</xref>. Noteworthy success has been achieved in the utilization of PLBs for the proliferation and multiplication of ornamental plants within the Araceae family. For example, Anthurium andreanum cv. CanCan exhibited 97.8% rate of PLB induction, averaging 120 PLBs for each explant over a period of 50 days in cultivation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-5">(Gantait et al., 2012)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-26">(Yu et al., 2009)</xref>. Similarly, TDZ was shown effective for inducing PLBs from leaf explants of Cattleya tigrine with 17.5% induction rate, and GA<sub>3</sub> significantly increases shoot regeneration from PLBs with approximately 220 developed plantlets per culture flask <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-4">(Fritsche et al., 2022)</xref>.</p><p>Despite these successes, there is currently no documented report on regeneration from PLBs on Anubias barteri var. nana Petite. Given the documented success of PLBs in various plant species, this study aimed to identify the optimal concentrations of plant growth regulators and potato extract for propagating this species through shoot tips and PLBs. The development of this micropropagation protocol provides a methodical approach to augment the propagation of Anubias barteri var. nana Petite, effectively overcoming the limitations of natural propagation methods.</p></sec><sec><title>MATERIALS AND METHODS</title><sec><title>Shoot Sterilization</title><p>Shoots of Anubias barteri var. nana Petite were subjected to surface sterilization using soap for 15 minutes, followed by exposure to an antifungal agent (Mancozeb, India) for 10 minutes, washed with running water, and further rinsed with 70% alcohol for 30 seconds. Subsequently, explants were soaked in a commercial bleach solution (5% sodium hypochlorite) at concentrations of 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% (v/v) for 15 minutes, followed by a 30-minute soak with an antibiotic solution (1 mg/mL). After disinfection, 3-5 mm shoot tip explants were isolated and placed on MS (Murashige and Skoog, 1962) basal medium.</p></sec><sec><title>Shoot Multiplication from Shoot Tips</title><p>Shoot tips free of microbial infection were cultured in MS media supplemented with (0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0 mg/L) BAP for 6 weeks for shoot induction. In a subsequent experiment, a single shoot (approximately 0.8 cm in height) was transferred to MS medium supplemented with various BAP concentrations (2.0, 3.0, 4.0 mg/L) for multiplication over 4 weeks. Shoot multiplication parameters, including the number of shoots, shoot height, number of leaves per shoot, and leaf length were recorded.</p></sec><sec><title>Protocorm-like Bodies (PLBs) Induction, Proliferation and Shoot Regeneration</title><p>For PLB induction, in vitro stems were separated from the cluster, leaves were removed, and the stem was cut into 1-2 mm transverse slices. These slices were placed on MS medium containing 10% (v/v) coconut water (CW), 2% (w/v) sucrose, and complemented with (0.5-3.0 mg/L) BAP along with (0.5-2.0 mg/L) NAA. The percentage of PLB induction and the number of PLBs per explant were recorded after 6 weeks of dark culturing. PLB morphology and counting were performed at 2X to 4X magnification under a stereo microscope (Olympus SZ51, Japan).</p></sec><sec><title>Secondary PLB Induction and Shoot Regeneration</title><p>For PLB proliferation, PLB clusters were separated into individuals and placed on MS medium containing 10% (v/v) CW, 2% (w/v) sucrose, added (0.5-1.5 mg/L) BA and (0.2-0.5 mg/L) IAA. After 3 weeks, the secondary PLB number and diameter, indicating PLB growth speed, were recorded.</p><p>To regenerate shoots from PLBs, tuber-shaped PLBs were separated and transferred to MS medium containing 10% (v/v) CW, 2% (w/v) sucrose, 1.0 g/L activated charcoal, 2 g/L peptone, and 1-3 mg/L BA and 0.5 mg/L IBA. After 3 weeks, shoot height was measured, and shoot quality was determined by leaf color, stem diameter, and leaf length.</p></sec><sec><title>Effect of Potato Extract on Shoot Proliferation</title><p>To assess the impact of potato extract on shoot proliferation, PLBs were cultured on MS medium complemented with 1.5 mg/L BAP and 0.5 mg/L NAA ranging from 10 g/L to 50 g/L of PE. Data on shoot number and individual shoot height were collected after the designated culture period.</p></sec><sec><title>Rooting</title><p>In vitro plantlets (1-1.5 cm) regenerated from PLBs were cultured on MS medium supplemented with 0.1% (w/v) activated carbon, 10% (v/v) CW, and Indole-3-Butyric Acid (IBA) at different concentrations (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 mg/L). After 4 weeks, the number of roots per shoot, root length, shoot height, and number of leaves per shoot were recorded.</p></sec><sec><title>Experimental Design and Statistical Analysis</title><p>All experiments were conducted in a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with three repetitions for each treatment, and each repetition included five jars, each containing at least one explant. The data underwent basic statistical analysis and were examined using ANOVA. Mean values were compared using Duncan’s method at 5% probability level. The data were presented as the average followed by the standard deviation (M±SD).</p></sec></sec><sec><title>RESULTS AND DISCUSSION</title><sec><title>Explants Sterilization</title><p>To prepare explants, decontamination was performed using various concentrations of commercial bleach (5% sodium hypochlorite) for a 15-minute disinfection. Explants were crucially transferred to clean water for at least one week before sterilization to avoid a high infection rate. A 10% bleach solution yielded a 40% disinfection rate, but higher concentrations (up to 40%) were necessary to achieve a 100% sterilization rate, ensuring successful decontamination. The shoot tips, retaining their green color, initiated new shoots.</p></sec><sec><title>Shoot Multiplication</title><p>In this experiment, varying concentrations of BAP were added to the MS medium to promote shoot formation and multiplication (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-1">Table 1</xref>). During the shoot induction stage, shoot tips showed distinct responses to different BAP concentrations after 10 days of culture. PGR-free MS media resulted in minimal shoot formation (1.13 shoots/explant), significantly increasing with higher BAP concentrations. The maximum shoot yield (5.33 shoots/explant) was observed after 6 weeks on a medium with 3 mg/L BA, showcasing superior quality in terms of average shoot height (1.01 cm), leaves per shoot (4.92), and leaf length (1.03 cm) (; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-1">Figure 1</xref>a-c). Subsequent stages confirmed the efficiency of 3 mg/L BAP in shoot multiplication, with clusters displaying large, green leaves, and long roots (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-1">Figure 1</xref>d-f).</p><p>The response to BAP concentration observed in this study aligns with previous research on Araceae species, such as A. barteri var nana <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-9">(Kanchanapoom et al., 2012)</xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-16">(Rittirat et al., 2021)</xref>, Cryptocoryne wendtii <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-17">(Rittirat et al., 2019)</xref>, and Anubias heterophylla <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-16">(Rittirat et al., 2021)</xref>. These findings highlight the significant impact of BAP concentration on shoot regeneration in A. barteri from shoot tips. However, adaptation to high PGR concentrations is not universal. For successful shoot regeneration from basal buds of A. barteri var. nana, it is necessary to use a minimal concentration of BAP (0.2 mg/L), and shoot elongation was obtained on PGR-free MS basal medium <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-22">(Sheeja et al., 2015)</xref>. Other studies within the Araceae family, utilizing lower BAP concentrations, resulted in fewer shoots <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-6">(George et al., 2015)</xref>.</p><p>concentrations after 6 weeks</p><p>In general, BA, with or without auxin supplementation, serves as the primary plant growth regulator in shoot induction and multiplication. MS medium supplemented with 3 mg/L BAP has proven suitable for maintaining long-term in vitro cultures. Shoot quality remained stable after four subculture cycles.</p></sec><sec><title>Protocorm-like Body (PLB) Induction</title><p>After 10 days of culture, transverse slices exhibited callus formation. After four weeks of cultivation, PLBs began to emerge, initially appearing opaque white and assuming a tuber-like shape (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-2">Table 2</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-2">Figure 2</xref>). The ANOVA and subsequent post hoc analysis demonstrated a highly significant influence of BAP and NAA, and their interaction, on explant responses. For BA, three distinct groups revealed concentrations that induced significant PLB formation. Similarly, specific NAA concentrations significantly impacted explant responses, particularly in PLB induction.</p><p>After 6 weeks of culture in media containing either 0.5 or 1.0 mg/L BAP combined with 0.5 mg/L NAA (P1, P3) resulted in underdeveloped buds on the browned callus, whereas 1.5 mg/L BAP with 1.0 or 1.5 mg/L NAA (P9, P15) induced callogenesis without PLBs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-2">Figure 2</xref>a-b). Conversely, treatments P2, P5, P8, P11, P12, P14, P19, P20, P21, and P23 led to significant PLB induction, showing variations in leafy plantlet, globular callus, and adventitious roots. Treatments P4, P6, P10, P13, P16, P17, P18, P22, P24 resulted in tiny PLB germination (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-2">Figure 2</xref>c-e). Specific combinations of BAP and NAA concentrations (1.0 mg/L BAP + 0.5 mg/L NAA; 3.0 mg/L BAP + 1.5 mg/L NAA; 1.0 mg/L BAP + 0.5 mg/L NAA) significantly enhanced PLB formation and leafy plantlet development (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-2">Figure 2</xref> f-h). However, concentration-dependent effects were observed, leading to callusing or limited PLB growth as certain concentrations. Notably, a BAP concentration of 1.5 mg/L, combined with 0.5 mg/L NAA, showed a tendency to promote a robust PLB induction rate.</p><table-wrap id="table-1"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p>Effect of BAP added to culture media on shoot formation after 6 weeks of culture</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle"><p>BAP</p><p>(mg/L)</p></th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">Number of shoots</th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle"><p>Shoot height</p><p>(cm)</p></th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">Number of leaves</th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle"><p>Leaf length</p><p>(cm)</p></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">0.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">1.13<sup>d</sup>± 0.12</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">0.89<sup>b</sup>± 0.09</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">4.1<sup>c</sup>± 0.55</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">0.93<sup>d</sup>± 0.04</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">1.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">2.07<sup>c</sup>± 0.12</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">0.89<sup>b</sup>± 0.05</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">4.33<sup>bc</sup>±0.31</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">0.94<sup>cd</sup>± 0.02</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">2.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">3.87<sup>b</sup> ±0.12</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">0.92<sup>b</sup>± 0.02</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">4.63<sup>ab</sup> ±0.30</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">0.96<sup>bc</sup>± 0.03</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">3.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">5.33<sup>a</sup> ±0.31</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">1.01<sup>a</sup>±0.06</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">4.92<sup>a</sup> ±0.30</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">1.03<sup>a</sup>± 0.01</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">4.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">4.20<sup>b</sup>± 0.20</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">0.93<sup>b</sup>± 0.03</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">4.71<sup>ab</sup> ±0.21</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">0.98<sup>b</sup>± 0.03</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Notes: Means followed by different letters indicate significant differences (Duncan's test, P = 0.05).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><fig id="figure-1"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p>Shoot induction from shoot tips (a-c) and multiplication (d-f) in response to varying BAP</p></caption><p>Notes: (a, d) = 2 mg/L BA; (b, e) = 3 mg/L BA; (c, f) = 4 mg/L BA.</p><graphic xlink:href="https://journal.biotrop.org/index.php/biotropia/article/download/in-vitro-plant-regeneration-of-anubias-barteri-var-nana-petite/version/2705/867/12064/IN_VITRO_PLANT_REGENERATION_THROUGH_PROTOCORM-LIKE_BODIES_DERIVED_FROM_STEM_THIN_LAYER_OF_Anubias_barteri_var_nana_Peti-g1.png" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="png"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig><table-wrap id="table-2"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p>Effect of BAP combined with NAA on callus/PLBs/shoot formation after 6 weeks of culture</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">Treatment</th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">BAP (mg/L)</th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">NAA (mg/L)</th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">PLB induction rate (%)</th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">PLBs/explant</th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">Morphogenesis of explant</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">P0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">0.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">0.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">0±0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">Callusing</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">P1</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">0.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">0.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">100</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">5.89<sup>bc</sup>±0.81</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">Tiny buds undeveloped, callus brown</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">P2</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">1.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">0.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">100</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">6.56<sup>ab</sup>±0.85</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">PLBs, leafy plantlets</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">P3</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">1.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">0.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">100</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">7.78<sup>a</sup>±0.93</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">Tiny buds undeveloped, callus brown</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">P4</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">2.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">0.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">100</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">3.44<sup>de</sup>±0.62</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">Tiny PLBs sprout</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">P5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">2.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">0.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">100</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">2.56<sup>def</sup>±0.53</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">PLBs, leafy plantlets</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">P6</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">3.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">0.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">100</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">3.67<sup>def</sup>±0.64</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">Tiny PLBs sprout</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">P7</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">0.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">1.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">100</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">4.56<sup>cd</sup>±0.71</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">Globular callus, adventitious buds</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">P8</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">1.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">1.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">100</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">4.44<sup>cd</sup>±0.70</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">PLBs sprout</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">P9</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">1.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">1.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">0<sup>g</sup>±0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">Callusing</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">P10</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">2.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">1.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">100</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">3.00<sup>def</sup>±0.58</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">Tiny PLBs sprout.</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">P11</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">2.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">1.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">100</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">1.22<sup>fg</sup>±0.37</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">PLBs, leafy plantlets</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">P12</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">3.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">1.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">100</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">3.00<sup>cdef</sup>±0.58</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">PLBs, leafy plantlets</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">P13</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">0.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">1.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">100</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">3.00<sup>def</sup>±0.58</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">Small globular PLBs, adventitious roots</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">P14</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">1.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">1.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">100</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">3.22<sup>de</sup>±0.60</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">PLBs sprout</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">P15</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">1.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">1.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">0<sup>g</sup>±0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">Callusing</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">P16</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">2.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">1.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">100</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">1.78<sup>efg</sup>±0.44</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">Small PLB</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">P17</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">2.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">1.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">100</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">1.00<sup>efg</sup>±0.33</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">Tiny PLBs sprout.</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">P18</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">3.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">1.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">100</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">1.11<sup>efg</sup>±0.35</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">PLBs</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">P19</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">0.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">2.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">100</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">2.33<sup>def</sup>±0.51</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">PLBs, adventitious roots</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">P20</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">1.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">2.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">100</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">2.00<sup>efg</sup>±0.47</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">PLBs sprout</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">P21</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">1.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">2.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">100</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">3.78<sup>de</sup>±0.65</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">PLBs, adventitious roots</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">P22</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">2.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">2.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">100</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">1.56<sup>def</sup>±0.42</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">Tiny PLBs sprouted.</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">P23</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">2.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">2.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">100</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">2.44<sup>defg</sup>±0.52</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">PLBs, leafy plantlets</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">P24</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">3.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">2.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">100</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="top">2.67<sup>def</sup>±0.54</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">Tiny PLBs sprouted, adventitious roots.</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Notes: Means followed by different letters indicate significant differences (Duncan's test, P = 0.01).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><fig id="figure-2"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p>Morphogenesis of transverse slices after 6 weeks of culture in the presence of different</p></caption><p>Notes: a = underdeveloped buds on the browned callus; b = callogenesis without PLB; concentrations of BAP and NAA c-e = PLB induction with various patterns, i.e., leafy plantlet, globular callus, adventitious roots, and tiny PLB germination; f-h = PLB formation and leafy plantlet development.</p><graphic xlink:href="https://journal.biotrop.org/index.php/biotropia/article/download/in-vitro-plant-regeneration-of-anubias-barteri-var-nana-petite/version/2705/867/12065/IN_VITRO_PLANT_REGENERATION_THROUGH_PROTOCORM-LIKE_BODIES_DERIVED_FROM_STEM_THIN_LAYER_OF_Anubias_barteri_var_nana_Peti-g2.png" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="png"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig><p>Research has showcased the efficacy of utilizing both NAA and BAP in stimulating PLB induction across different species within the Araceae family. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-16">(Rittirat et al., 2021)</xref> demonstrated the number of shoots per explants (3.60±0.24) was formed in the culture medium containing 1.0 mg/L NAA in combination with 1.0 mg/L BAP, followed by culture medium with 3.0 mg/L BAP (2.40±0.24). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-12">(Mondal et al., 2014)</xref> found that a combination of 2 mg/L NAA and 2 mg/L BAP was most effective for PLB induction in Doritis pulcherrima Lindl. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-21">(Sarma &amp; Tanti, 2017)</xref> further supported these findings, showing that a combination of 3.0 mg/L BAP and 1.0 mg/L NAA was most successful in inducing shoot formation in Aristolochia saccate. These studies collectively demonstrated that a combination of NAA and BAP is a popular approach for promoting PLB induction and plantlet regeneration in Araceae species.</p></sec><sec><title>Secondary PLB Induction and Shoot Regeneration</title><p>PLBs were subcultured on MS media with varying BAP and IAA concentrations, leading to secondary PLB (sPLB) formation (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-3">Table 3</xref>). At 0.5 mg/L BAP and 0.2 mg/L IAA, a 25.0% PLB induction rate was observed, with a mean diameter of 0.61 cm. However, the quantity of sPLB generated by each explant was 0.33, indicating moderate development. Increasing BAP to 1.0 mg/L whereas maintaining 0.2 mg/L IAA resulted in a notable decline in the PLB induction rate (0.00%), along with a decrease in both the number of secondary PLBs and their diameter, suggesting a dose-dependent negative effect of BAP on PLB formation at this concentration. Interestingly, at 1.0 mg/L BAP with an elevated IAA concentration of 0.5 mg/L, the PLB induction rate rebounded to 33.3%, with an increase in both the number of sPLB and their diameter, suggesting a potential synergistic effect between BAP and IAA. At the highest concentrations of both BAP (1.5 mg/L) and IAA (0.5 mg/L), the PLB induction rate reached 68.1%, demonstrating substantial improvement. The number of sPLBs increased to 1.55, and the diameter of the PLBs reached 0.67 cm, indicating a robust response to the combined higher concentrations of BAP and IAA. These results highlight the significant influence of the interplay between BAP and IAA concentrations on PLB induction and subsequent development. The optimal combination for enhanced PLB formation appears to be 1.5 mg/L BAP and 0.5 mg/L IAA, offering valuable insights for optimizing micropropagation protocols for this specific plant.</p><p>The impact of different concentrations of BAP and IBA on shoot regeneration from PLBs is presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-4">Table 4</xref>. At 1.0 mg/L BAP and 0.5 mg/L IBA, shoots reached a height of 0.65 cm. Increasing BAP to 1.5 mg/L whereas maintaining IBA at 0.5 mg/L resulted in a slightly improved shoot length of 0.68 cm and enhanced shoot quality. Similarly, at BAP concentrations of 2.0 mg/L and 2.5 mg/L with 0.5 mg/L IBA, shoot length remained consistent at 0.68 cm. At higher BAP concentrations (3.0 mg/L) and 0.5 mg/L IBA, the shoot length increased to 0.83 cm. Notably, increasing IBA to 1.0 mg/L with BAP at 1.0 mg/L significantly improved shoot length to 1.23 cm, with good quality, indicating vigorous shoot regeneration. For BAP ranging from 1.5 mg/L to 3.0 mg/L with 1.0 mg/L IBA, shoot lengths varied from 0.94 cm to 1.57 cm, and the shoot quality was good.</p><p>These results emphasized the crucial role of the interaction between BAP and IBA concentrations in shoot regeneration potential from PLBs. The combination of BAP and IAA is effective in promoting shoot proliferation and elongation in Quercus suber L. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-19">(Romano et al., 1992)</xref>. This combination also enhances shoot growth and proliferation in Aegle marmelos <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-1">(Ajithkumar &amp; Seeni, 1998)</xref>. In the production of PLBs in orchids, BAP is the most effective growth regulator, followed by kinetin, NAA, IAA, 2,4-D, and gibberellic acid (GA3) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-20">(Saiprasad et al., 2002)</xref>. In the case of pointed gourd, BAP has been found to induce callus formation, whereas the addition of IAA has been shown to enhance rooting <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-10">(Komal, 2011)</xref>. These findings suggested that the combination of BAP and IAA may have a positive effect on PLBs multiplication and shoot regeneration in Araceae, but further research is needed to confirm this.</p></sec><sec><title>Impact of Potato Extract on Shoot Regeneration</title><p>The impact of varying potato extract (PE) concentrations on shoot regeneration from PLBs is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-5">Table 5</xref>. Without PE, an average of 2.33 shoots was noted for each explant, accompanied by an average shoot length of 1.21 cm. However, at 10 g/L, 20 g/L, and 30 g/L PE, the number of shoots per explant nearly doubled to 4.19, 4.37, and 4.62, and the shoot height increased to 1.72, 2.08, and 2.36 cm. The most significant enhancement in shoot regeneration occurred at 40 g/L and 50 g/L PE concentrations. At 40 g/L, shoots per explant increased to 5.52, and the shoot height reached 2.74 cm. The highest concentration, 50 g/L, yielded the most favourable outcome, with 6.55 shoots per explant and a maximum shoot height of 2.80 cm (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-3">Figure 3</xref>). This highlighted a positive correlation between PE concentration and both the quantity and quality of shoots regenerated from PLBs, suggesting a potential role of specific compounds within the PE in promoting shoot development.</p><p>Studies indicate that plantlet regeneration from protocorm-like bodies in orchids is significantly enhanced by the application of PE. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-13">(Rahman et al., 2004)</xref> found that PE enhanced plantlet regeneration and growth, with the optimum concentration being 100 mL/L. This finding was further supported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-8">(Islam et al., 2012)</xref>, who reported that PE enhances the germination of seeds and the growth of seedlings of Vanda roxburgii orchids. The beneficial impact of PE on the growth and development of PLBs was also demonstrated by Lee (2003) in Cypripedium formosanum <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-11">(Lee &amp; Lee, 2003)</xref>. Collectively, these studies suggest that PE can be a valuable supplement in the medium for regenerating of plantlets from PLBs in orchids.</p></sec><sec><title>Effects of IBA on Rooting and Plantlet Growth</title><p>The impact of IBA on the root and plantlet development of A. barteri after a 4-week culture period is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-6">Table 6</xref>.</p><p>With IBA of 0.5 mg/L, all parameters showed significant improvement. The number of roots increased to 6.19, with a longer average root length of 2.50 cm. Shoot height and leaf number also increased to 4.72 cm and 6.81, respectively. At 1.0 mg/L IBA, whereas the number of roots slightly decreased to 4.81, both root length (2.14 cm) and shoot height (4.80 cm) remained relatively higher compared to the control, with a leaf number of 6.11. Further increases in IBA concentration to 1.5 mg/L and 2.0 mg/L led to a gradual decline in the number and length of roots, shoot height, and leaf number. The results indicated that IBA positively influences root and plantlet development in A. barteri var. nana Petite with an optimal response observed at 0.5 mg/L IBA. Higher concentrations, beyond 0.5 mg/L, showed diminishing returns, suggesting a dose-dependent effect.</p><table-wrap id="table-3"><label>Table 3</label><caption><p>Effect of BA and IAA added to secondary PLB induction after 4 weeks of culture</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th colspan="2" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top"><p>Plant growth regulators (mg/L)</p></th><th colspan="1" rowspan="2" style="" align="center" valign="middle">sPLB induction rate (%)</th><th colspan="1" rowspan="2" style="" align="center" valign="middle">sPLBs/explant</th><th colspan="1" rowspan="2" style="" align="center" valign="middle">Diameter of PLB (cm)</th></tr><tr><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">BA</th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">IAA</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">0.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">0.2</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">25.0<sup>b</sup>±14.4</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">0.33<sup>bc</sup>±0.33</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">0.61<sup>abc</sup>±0.10</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">1.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">0.2</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">0.00<sup>b</sup>±0.00</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">0.00<sup>c</sup>±0.00</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">0.50<sup>c</sup>±0.06</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">1.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">0.2</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">8.33<sup>a</sup>±8.33</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">0.33<sup>bc</sup>±0.33</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">0.51<sup>bc</sup>±0.01</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">0.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">0.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">25.0<sup>b</sup>±14.4</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">1.00<sup>ab</sup>±0.00</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">0.56<sup>abc</sup>±0.03</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">1.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">0.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">33.33<sup>b</sup>±8.33</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">1.00<sup>ab</sup>±0.00</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">0.65<sup>ab</sup>±0.03</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">1.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">0.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">68.06<sup>b</sup>±3.67</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">1.55<sup>a</sup>±0.29</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">0.67<sup>a</sup>±0.16</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Notes: Means followed by different letters indicate significant differences (Duncan's test, P = 0.05).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table-4"><label>Table 4</label><caption><p>Effect of BAP combined IBA on shoot formation from protocorm-like bodies</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle"><p>BAP</p><p>(mg/L)</p></th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle"><p>IBA</p><p>(mg/L)</p></th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle"><p>Shoot height</p><p>(cm)</p></th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">Shoot quality</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">1.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">0.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">0.65<sup>b</sup>±0.09</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">Poor</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">1.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">0.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">0.68<sup>b</sup>±0.09</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">Fair</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">2.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">0.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">0.68<sup>b</sup>±0.09</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">Fair</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">2.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">0.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">0.83<sup>b</sup>±0.08</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">Fair</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">3.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">0.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">0.74<sup>b</sup>±0.14</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">Fair</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">1.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">1.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">1.23<sup>ab</sup>±0.20</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">Excellent</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">1.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">1.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">0.94<sup>ab</sup>±0.27</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">Fair</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">2.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">1.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">1.00<sup>ab</sup>±0.24</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">Fair</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">2.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">1.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">0.91<sup>ab</sup>±0.09</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">Good</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">3.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">1.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">1.57<sup>a</sup>±0.55</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">Fair</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Notes: Means followed by different letters indicate significant differences (Duncan's test, P = 0.05).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table-5"><label>Table 5</label><caption><p>Impact of potato extract on the quantity and quality of shoots</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle"><p>Potato extract (g/L)</p></th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">Shoots/explant</th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle"><p>Shoot height (cm)</p></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">2.33<sup>e</sup>±0.11</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">1.21<sup>e</sup>±0.06</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">10</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">4.19<sup>d</sup>±0.13</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">1.72<sup>d</sup>±0.13</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">20</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">4.37<sup>cd</sup>±0.06</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">2.08<sup>c</sup>±0.07</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">30</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">4.62<sup>c</sup>±0.17</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">2.36<sup>b</sup>±0.11</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">40</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">5.52<sup>b</sup>±0.23</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">2.74<sup>a</sup>±0.07</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">50</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">6.55<sup>a</sup>±0.19</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">2.80<sup>a</sup>±0.04</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Notes: Means followed by different letters indicate significant differences (Duncan's test, P = 0.05).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><fig id="figure-3"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p>The effect of potato extract on the growth of PLBs derived plantlets</p></caption><p>Notes: a = 0 g/L; b = 10 g/L; c = 20 g/L; d = 30 g/L; e = 40 g/L; f = 50 g/L.</p><graphic xlink:href="https://journal.biotrop.org/index.php/biotropia/article/download/in-vitro-plant-regeneration-of-anubias-barteri-var-nana-petite/version/2705/867/12066/IN_VITRO_PLANT_REGENERATION_THROUGH_PROTOCORM-LIKE_BODIES_DERIVED_FROM_STEM_THIN_LAYER_OF_Anubias_barteri_var_nana_Peti-g3.png" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="png"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig><table-wrap id="table-6"><label>Table 6</label><caption><p>Effects of IBA on root and plantlet after 4 weeks of culture</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle"><p>IBA (mg/L)</p></th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">No. of roots</th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle"><p>Root length (cm)</p></th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle"><p>Shoot height</p><p>(cm)</p></th><th colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="center" valign="middle">No. of leaves</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">0.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">4.22<sup>bc</sup>±0.29</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">1.64<sup>c</sup>±0.33</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">4.12<sup>b</sup>±0.31</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">5.22<sup>bc</sup>±0.40</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">0.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">6.19<sup>a</sup>±0.56</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">2.50<sup>a</sup>±0.11</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">4.72<sup>a</sup>±0.14</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">6.81<sup>a</sup>±0.45</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">1.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">4.81<sup>b</sup>±0.39</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">2.14<sup>ab</sup>±0.19</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">4.80<sup>a</sup>±0.19</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">6.11<sup>ab</sup>±0.51</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">1.5</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">3.33<sup>cd</sup>±0.22</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">1.74<sup>bc</sup>±0.07</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">4.19<sup>b</sup>±0.07</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">4.74<sup>cd</sup>±0.17</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">2.0</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">2.70<sup>d</sup>±0.17</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">1.05<sup>d</sup>±0.02</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">3.94<sup>b</sup>±0.09</td><td colspan="1" rowspan="1" style="" align="left" valign="top">4.00<sup>d</sup>±0.22</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Notes: Means followed by different letters indicate significant differences (Duncan's test, P = 0.05).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec><title>CONCLUSION</title><p>This study successfully developed a micropropagation protocol for Anubias barteri var. nana Petite, enabling rapid and efficient multiplication. Through precise sterilization and optimized growth conditions, including the use of 3 mg/L benzyl adenine (BAP), the protocol demonstrated high rates of shoot regeneration. Additionally, the induction of protocorm-like bodies (PLBs) from stem explants and subsequent shoot regeneration highlighted the effectiveness of 1.5 mg/L BAP combined with 0.5 mg/L NAA or 0.2 mg/L IAA; 3 mg/L BAP plus 1.5 mg/L IBA. The study also demonstrates the impact of 50 g/L of potato extract on shoot proliferation and 0.5 mg/L of indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) in root development. This improved method presents a promising approach for the mass production of A. barteri var. nana Petite, addressing the challenges associated with natural propagation and meeting market demands for this valued ornamental aquatic plant.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="BIBR-1"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Rapid clonal multiplication through in vitro axillary shoot proliferation of Aegle marmelos (L.) Corr., a medicinal tree</article-title><source>Plant Cell Reports</source><volume>17</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ajithkumar</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Seeni</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>1998</year><fpage>422</fpage><lpage>6</lpage><page-range>422-6</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s002990050418</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-2"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>An overview of orchid protocorm-like bodies: Mass propagation, biotechnology, molecular aspects, and breeding</article-title><source>Int J Mol Sci</source><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cardoso</surname><given-names>J.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zanello</surname><given-names>C.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>J.T.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-3"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Plant regeneration through protocorm-like bodies induced from nodal explants of Syngonium podophyllum “White Butterfly</article-title><source>Hortic Sci</source><volume>43</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cui</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Deng</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Henny</surname><given-names>R.J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2008</year><fpage>2129</fpage><lpage>33</lpage><page-range>2129-33</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21273/HORTSCI.43.7.2129</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-4"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Cattleya tigrina (Orchidaceae) in vitro regeneration: Main factors for optimal protocorm-like body induction and multiplication, plantlet regeneration, and cytogenetic stability</article-title><source>S Afr J Bot</source><volume>149</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fritsche</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Deola</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Silva</surname><given-names>D.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Holderbaum</surname><given-names>D.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Guerra</surname><given-names>M.P.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>96</fpage><lpage>108</lpage><page-range>96-108</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-5"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Direct induction of protocorm-like bodies from shoot tips, plantlet formation, and clonal fidelity analysis in Anthurium andreanum cv</article-title><source>CanCan. J Plant Growth Regul</source><volume>67</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gantait</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sinniah</surname><given-names>U.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mandal</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Das</surname><given-names>P.K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2012</year><fpage>257</fpage><lpage>70</lpage><page-range>257-70</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10725-012-9684-4</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-6"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>In vitro propagation of an ornamental aquatic plant, Anubias barteri var. nana Petite</article-title><source>Res J Article</source><volume>18</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>George</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Joseph</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Korath</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2015</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>12</lpage><page-range>1-12</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-7"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Rapid in vitro multiplication of the aquatic angiosperm, Anubias barteri var. undulata</article-title><source>Aquat Bot</source><volume>47</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>L.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chang</surname><given-names>Y.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chang</surname><given-names>Y.L.</given-names></name></person-group><year>1994</year><page-range>1010160304-37709490050-7</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-8"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effect of potato extract on in vitro seed germination and seedling growth of local Vanda roxburgii orchid</article-title><source>J Bangladesh Agril Univ</source><volume>9</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Islam</surname><given-names>M.O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Akter</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>AKMAUD</surname><given-names>Prodhan</given-names></name></person-group><year>2012</year><fpage>211</fpage><lpage>5</lpage><page-range>211-5</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22004/ag.econ.208642</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-9"><element-citation publication-type="chapter"><article-title>Micropropagation of Anubias barteri var. nana from shoot tip culture and the analysis of ploidy stability</article-title><source>Not Bot Horti Agrobo 40:148-51</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kanchanapoom</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chunui</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kanchanapoom</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2012</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15835/nbha4027520</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-10"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effect of BAP and IAA on callus formation and plant regeneration in pointed gourd</article-title><source>Biotechnology, Bioinformatics and Bioengineering</source><volume>1</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Komal</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2011</year><fpage>59</fpage><lpage>62</lpage><page-range>59-62</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-11"><element-citation publication-type="chapter"><article-title>Plant regeneration from protocorm-derived callus of Cypripedium formosanum</article-title><source>Vitro Cellular &amp; Developmental Biology. Plant 39:475-9</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>Y.I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2003</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1079/IVP2003450</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-12"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>In vitro axillary shoot regeneration and direct protocorm-like body induction from axenic shoot tips of Doritis pulcherrima Lindl</article-title><source>Plant Tissue Cult Biotechnol</source><volume>23</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mondal</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Aditya</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Banerjee</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2014</year><fpage>251</fpage><lpage>61</lpage><page-range>251-61</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-13"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effects of complex organic extracts on plantlet regeneration from PLBs and plantlet growth in the Doritaenopsis orchid</article-title><source>Jpn Agr Res Q</source><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rahman</surname><given-names>A.R.M.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Islam</surname><given-names>M.O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ichihashi</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2004</year><fpage>55</fpage><lpage>9</lpage><page-range>55-9</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.6090/jarq.38.55</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-14"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>In vitro plant regeneration of Esmeralda clarkei Rchb.f. via protocorm explant</article-title><source>Afr J Biotechnol</source><volume>11</volume><issue>54</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ram</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2012</year><fpage>11704</fpage><lpage>8</lpage><page-range>11704-8</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5897/AJB12.985</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-15"><element-citation publication-type=""><article-title>Adventitious shoot organogenesis from shoot tip explants of an ornamental aquatic plant Anubias barteri var</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rittirat</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Klaocheed</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kalawong</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Thammasiri</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-16"><element-citation publication-type="paper-conference"><article-title>Thidiazuron induces high-frequency plant regeneration from shoot tip explants of an ornamental aquatic plant, Anubias barteri var. nana</article-title><source>IX International Scientific and Practical Conference on Biotechnology as an Instrument for Plant Biodiversity Conservation</source><volume>1339</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rittirat</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Klaocheed</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Thammasiri</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>273</fpage><lpage>80</lpage><page-range>273-80</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-17"><element-citation publication-type="paper-conference"><article-title>An efficient in vitro plantlet regeneration of an ornamental aquatic plant Anubias heterophylla through shoot tip culture</article-title><source>International Symposium on Botanical Gardens and Landscapes. 1298:265-72</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rittirat</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Klaocheed</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Thammasiri</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Walam</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17660/ActaHortic.2020.1298.36</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-18"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>In vitro rapid multiplication of a highly valuable ornamental aquatic plant Anubias heterophylla</article-title><source>Trends Sci</source><volume>18</volume><issue>19</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rittirat</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Thammasiri</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Klaocheed</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.48048/tis.2021.3</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-19"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Influence of growth regulators on shoot proliferation in Quercus suber L</article-title><source>Annals of Botany</source><volume>70</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Romano</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Noronha</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Martins-Loução</surname><given-names>M.A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>1992</year><fpage>531</fpage><lpage>536</lpage><page-range>531-536</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a088513</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-20"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effect of various growth regulators on the production of protocorm-like bodies in three orchid genera</article-title><source>Indian J Plant Physiol</source><volume>7</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Saiprasad</surname><given-names>G.V.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Raghuveer</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Khetrapal</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chandra</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2002</year><fpage>35</fpage><lpage>9</lpage><page-range>35-9</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-21"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>In vitro regeneration of plantlets from nodal explants of Aristolochia saccata and Aristolochia cathcartii</article-title><source>Eur J Biol Res</source><volume>7</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sarma</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tanti</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><fpage>191</fpage><lpage>201</lpage><page-range>191-201</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5281/zenodo.825746</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-22"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>In vitro propagation of an ornamental aquatic plant, Anubias barteri var. nana Petite</article-title><source>Int J Current Sci</source><volume>18</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sheeja</surname><given-names>G.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Joseph</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Korath</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2015</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>12</lpage><page-range>1-12</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-23"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>High frequency of protocorm-like bodies (PLBs) induction and plant regeneration from protocorm and leaf sections of Aerides crispum</article-title><source>Sci Hortic</source><volume>106</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sheelavanthmath</surname><given-names>S.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Murthy</surname><given-names>H.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hema</surname><given-names>B.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hahn</surname><given-names>E.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Paek</surname><given-names>K.Y.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2005</year><fpage>395</fpage><lpage>401</lpage><page-range>395-401</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scienta.2005.04.012</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-24"><element-citation publication-type="paper-conference"><article-title>Anubias (Anubias sp.) propagation through hydroponic culture technique</article-title><source>Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1422(1):012024. IOP Publishing.DOI</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sholichah</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yamin</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ginanjar</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Meilisza</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>1010881742</fpage><lpage>659614221012024</lpage><page-range>1010881742-659614221012024</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-25"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effect of gibberellic acid on in vitro flowering from stem node explant of Anubias barteri var. nana</article-title><source>Res J Biotechnol</source><volume>14</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Surendra</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Aasim</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fatih</surname><given-names>Ö.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sebahattin</surname><given-names>Ö.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-26"><element-citation publication-type=""><article-title>Plant regeneration by callus-mediated protocorm-like body induction of Anthurium andraeanum Hort Agr Sci China 8(5):572-7</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>Y.X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>L.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>J.X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>J.W.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2009</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S1671-2927(08)60248-5</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
